Abstract
Purpose:
To combine objective machine-derived corneal parameters obtained with new swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) tomographer (Anterion) to differentiate between normal (N), keratoconus (KC) and forme fruste KC (FFKC).


Setting:
Laser Center, Hôpital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France.


Design:
Retrospective study.


Methods:
281 eyes of 281 patients were included and divided into 3 groups: N (n = 156), FFKC (n = 43), and KC (n = 82). Eyes were included in each group based on objective evaluation using Nidek Corneal Navigator, and subjective evaluation by authors. The SS-OCT system provided anterior and posterior corneal surface and pachymetry derived variables. The training set was composed of 143 eyes (95 N, 43 FFKC). Discriminant analysis was used to determine the group of an observation based on a set of variables. The obtained formula was tested in the validation set composed of 61 N and 82 KC.


Results:
Among curvature parameters, the FFKC had significantly higher irregularity index at 3 mm and 5 mm, higher inferior-superior index, higher SteepK-OppositeK index and inferiorly decentered posterior steepest keratometry. Among thickness parameters: central pachymetry, thinnest pachymetry, percentage of thickness increase from center to periphery, and inferior decentration of the thinnest point were statistically different between groups. Combination of multiple variables into a discriminant function (F1) included 5 parameters and reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.95 (sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 98.5%) for detection of FFKC. F1 differentiates N from KC with AUROC = 0.99 (sensitivity = 99%, specificity = 99%).


Conclusions:
Combining anterior and posterior curvatures variables along with pachymetric data obtained from SS-OCT allowed automated detection of early KC and KC with very good accuracy (87% and 99.5% respectively).
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
26
[1]
Seiler "Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus" J Cataract Refract Surg (1998) 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80057-6
[2]
Randleman "Validation of the Ectasia Risk Score System for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening" Am J Ophthalmol (2008) 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.033
[3]
Lopes "Enhanced tomographic assessment to detect corneal ectasia based on artificial intelligence" Am J Ophthalmol (2018) 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.005
[4]
Klyce "Screening patients with the corneal navigator" J Refract Surg (2005) 10.3928/1081-597x-20050902-12
[5]
Saad "Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas" Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2010) 10.1167/iovs.10-5369
[6]
Biomechanical Properties of Keratoconus Suspect Eyes

Alain Saad, Yara Lteif, Elodie Azan et al.

Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2010 10.1167/iovs.09-4304
[7]
Smadja "Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification" Am J Ophthalmol (2013) 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.034
[8]
Flockerzi "Combined biomechanical and tomographic keratoconus staging: adding a biomechanical parameter to the ABCD keratoconus staging system" Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) (2021)
[9]
Reinstein "Detection of keratoconus in clinically and algorithmically topographically normal fellow eyes using epithelial thickness analysis" J Refract Surg (2015) 10.3928/1081597x-20151021-02
[10]
Li "Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes" Ophthalmology (2012) 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.023
[11]
Temstet "Corneal epithelial thickness mapping using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for detection of form fruste keratoconus" J Cataract Refract Surg (2015) 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.043
[12]
Li "Subclinical keratoconus detection by pattern analysis of corneal and epithelial thickness maps with optical coherence tomography" J Cataract Refract Surg (2016) 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.021
[13]
Ramos "Variability of subjective classifications of corneal topography maps from LASIK candidates" J Refract Surg (2013) 10.3928/1081597x-20130823-01
[14]
Randleman "Comparison of objective and subjective refractive surgery screening parameters between regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices" J Cataract Refract Surg (2015) 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.026
[15]
Saad "Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus" Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2012) 10.1167/iovs.11-8803
[16]
Hwang "Distinguishing highly asymmetric keratoconus eyes using combined Scheimpflug and spectral-domain OCT analysis" Ophthalmology (2018) 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.06.020
[17]
Montalbán "Correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in keratoconus" Cornea (2013) 10.1097/ico.0b013e3182904950
[18]
Tomidokoro "Changes in anterior and posterior corneal curvatures in keratoconus" Ophthalmology (2000) 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00159-7
[19]
Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: Tomographic indices to detect keratoconus

Renato Ambrósio, Ruiz Simonato Alonso, Allan Luz et al.

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2006 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.06.025
[20]
[21]
Ruiseñor Vázquez "Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases" Am J Ophthalmol (2014) 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.03.018
[22]
Imbornoni "Long-term tomographic evaluation of unilateral keratoconus" Cornea (2017) 10.1097/ico.0000000000001295
[23]
Silverman "Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus" Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2014) 10.1167/iovs.13-12578
[24]
Kanellopoulos "Correlation between epithelial thickness in normal corneas, untreated ectatic corneas, and ectatic corneas previously treated with CXL; is overall epithelial thickness a very early ectasia prognostic factor?" Clin Ophthalmol (2012) 10.2147/opth.s31524
[25]
Toprak "Diagnostic value of corneal epithelial and stromal thickness distribution profiles in forme fruste keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus" Cornea (2021) 10.1097/ico.0000000000002435
[26]
Arbelaez "Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data" Ophthalmology (2012) 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.005
Metrics
9
Citations
26
References
Details
Published
Nov 01, 2023
Vol/Issue
49(11)
Pages
1092-1097
Cite This Article
Alain Saad, Guillaume Debellemanière, Pierre Zeboulon, et al. (2023). Discrimination between keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal eyes using a novel OCT-based tomographer. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 49(11), 1092-1097. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001275
Related

You May Also Like

Anatomy and physiology of the cornea

Derek W. DelMonte, Terry Kim · 2011

716 citations

Astigmatism analysis by the Alpins method

Noel Alpins · 2001

502 citations

Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome associated with tamsulosin

David F. Chang, John R. Campbell · 2005

430 citations