Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
28
[3]
Silicon quantum electronics

Floris A. Zwanenburg, Andrew S. Dzurak, Andrea Morello et al.

Reviews of Modern Physics 10.1103/revmodphys.85.961
[9]
An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity

M. Veldhorst, J. C. C. Hwang, C. H. Yang et al.

Nature Nanotechnology 10.1038/nnano.2014.216
[11]
A quantum-dot spin qubit with coherence limited by charge noise and fidelity higher than 99.9%

Jun Yoneda, Kenta Takeda, Tomohiro Otsuka et al.

Nature Nanotechnology 10.1038/s41565-017-0014-x
[18]
Tuning Methods for Semiconductor Spin Qubits

Tim Botzem, Michael D. Shulman, Sandra Foletti et al.

Physical Review Applied 10.1103/physrevapplied.10.054026
[21]
Computer-automated tuning procedures for semiconductor quantum dot arrays

A. R. Mills, M. M. Feldman, C. Monical et al.

Applied Physics Letters 10.1063/1.5121444
[23]
A. Krizhevsky (2012)
[26]
QFlow lite dataset: A machine-learning approach to the charge states in quantum dot experiments

Justyna P. Zwolak, Sandesh S. Kalantre, Xingyao Wu et al.

PLoS ONE 10.1371/journal.pone.0205844
[27]
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization

J. A. Nelder, R. Mead

The Computer Journal 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
[28]
Implementing the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm with adaptive parameters

Fuchang Gao, Lixing Han

Computational Optimization and Applications 10.1007/s10589-010-9329-3
Metrics
63
Citations
28
References
Details
Published
Mar 31, 2020
Vol/Issue
13(3)
License
View
Funding
Department of Energy Award: DE-FG02-03ER46028
National Science Foundation
Army Research Office Award: W911NF-17-1-0274
Joint Quantum Institute (JQI) – Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science
Cite This Article
Justyna P. Zwolak, Thomas McJunkin, Sandesh S. Kalantre, et al. (2020). Autotuning of Double-Dot Devices In Situ with Machine Learning. Physical Review Applied, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.13.034075
Related

You May Also Like