Knowledge management in family firms: a systematic review, integrated insights and future research opportunities

Emma Su; Joshua Daspit

doi:10.1108/jkm-08-2020-0658

journal article Sep 13, 2021

Knowledge management in family firms: a systematic review, integrated insights and future research opportunities

Emma Su Joshua Daspit

Journal of Knowledge Management Vol. 26 No. 2 pp. 291-325 · Emerald

View at Publisher Save 10.1108/jkm-08-2020-0658

Abstract

Purpose
The literature related to knowledge management (KM) is robust with respect to insights regarding firms in general. However, less is known about the KM of family firms despite these firms being the most common form of business organization worldwide. Further, even though the number of studies examining family-firm KM has increased in recent years, the insights gained remain fragmented. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to help coalesce and advance the study of family-firm KM.

Design/methodology/approach
In pursuit of these goals, a systematic literature review was conducted. Using a 6-step, systematic literature review protocol, 74 articles focused on family-firm KM published in 23 journals were identified and reviewed.

Findings
This literature review contributes to the synthesis and advancement of family-firm KM scholarship in several ways. First, key factors and relationships are identified and integrated into a robust framework. Second, scholarly insights are synthesized, and a review of the primary antecedents, outcomes and moderating factors associated with family-firm KM processes is presented. Third, promising opportunities for future research are highlighted to advance family-firm KM scholarship.

Originality/value
With a focus on reducing the fragmentation in the literature, this review synthesizes insights related to the most commonly studied antecedents, outcomes and moderators associated with family-firm KM. Additionally, antecedents are organized and reviewed according to the nature of their influence on family-firm KM processes, highlighting the simultaneous opposite effects of some influences. Further, key outcomes are synthesized based on their family versus firm-centric orientation. Even further, insights and opportunities focused on advancing the theory, antecedents, outcomes, moderators and other issues related to family-firm KM are presented in an effort to support the continued progress of scholarship in this area.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

161

[1]

What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility

Herman Aguinis, Ante Glavas

Journal of Management 2012 10.1177/0149206311436079

[2]

*Aiello "Does external R&D matter for family firm innovation? Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry" Small Business Economics (2020)

[3]

Review : Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations And Research Issues1,2

Maryam Alavi, Dorothy E. Leidner

MIS Quarterly 2001 10.2307/3250961

[4]

Andreini "How do consumers see firms’ family nature? A review of the literature" Family Business Review (2020) 10.1177/0894486519890229

[5]

Argote "The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings" Management Science (1990) 10.1287/mnsc.36.2.140

[6]

The Development of Organizational Social Capital: Attributes of Family Firms*

Jean‐Luc Arregle, Michael A. Hitt, David G. Sirmon et al.

Journal of Management Studies 2007 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x

[7]

Ayyagari "Firm innovation in emerging markets: the role of finance, governance, and competition" Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (2011) 10.1017/s0022109011000378

[8]

*Baday Yıldız "Scrutinizing innovation performance of family firms in efficiency-driven environment" Journal of Business Research (2021) 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.022

[9]

*Bamel "Organizational resources, KM process capability and strategic flexibility: a dynamic resource-capability perspective" Journal of Knowledge Management (2018)

[10]

*Barros "A theoretical model of strategic management of family firms. A dynamic capabilities approach" Journal of Family Business Strategy (2016) 10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.06.002

[11]

Basco "Family business and regional development – a theoretical model of regional familiness" Journal of Family Business Strategy (2015) 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.04.004

[12]

Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms

Pascual Berrone, Cristina Cruz, Luis R. Gomez-Mejia

Family Business Review 2012 10.1177/0894486511435355

[13]

*Biscotti "Do environmental management systems affect the knowledge management process? The impact on the learning evolution and the relevance of organisational context" Journal of Knowledge Management (2018) 10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0344

[14]

Boyd "Strategic management of a family-owned airline: analysing the absorptive capacity of Cimber Sterling Group A/S" Journal of Family Business Strategy (2012) 10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.03.003

[15]

*Boh "Investor experience and innovation performance: the mediating role of external cooperation" Strategic Management Journal (2020)

[16]

*Bouncken "Family firms, alliance governance and mutual knowledge creation" British Journal of Management (2020)

[17]

Brigham "Researching long-term orientation: a validation study and recommendations for future research" Family Business Review (2014) 10.1177/0894486513508980

[18]

*Brinkerink "Broad search, deep search, and the absorptive capacity performance of family and nonfamily firm RandD" Family Business Review (2018) 10.1177/0894486518775187

[19]

*Brinkerink "When can families fill voids? Firms’ reliance on formal and informal institutions in RandD decisions" Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (2021) 10.1177/1042258719899423

[20]

*Cabrera-Suárez "The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm" Family Business Review (2001) 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x

[21]

Cabrera-Suárez "Familiness and market orientation: a stakeholder approach" Journal of Family Business Strategy (2011) 10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.01.001

[22]

*Cabrera-Suárez "A dynamic network model of the successor’s knowledge construction from the resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm" Family Business Review (2018) 10.1177/0894486518776867

[23]

Casprini "How family firms execute open innovation strategies: the Loccioni case" Journal of Knowledge Management (2017) 10.1108/jkm-11-2016-0515

[24]

*Cesinger "A socioemotional wealth perspective on how collaboration intensity, trust, and international market knowledge affect family firms’ multinationality" Journal of World Business (2016) 10.1016/j.jwb.2016.02.004

[25]

Chaudhary "Absorptive capacity and small family firm performance: exploring the mediation processes" Journal of Knowledge Management (2018) 10.1108/jkm-01-2017-0047

[26]

*Chirico "Knowledge accumulation in family firms: evidence from four case studies" International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship (2008) 10.1177/0266242608091173

[27]

*Chirico "Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: the role of organizational culture" International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship (2010) 10.1177/0266242610370402

[28]

*Chirico "Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms" Family Business Review (2008) 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00117.x

[29]

*Chirico "Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: when relational and affective factors matter" Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (2016) 10.1111/etap.12114

[30]

Chirico "Resource orchestration in family firms: investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance" Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal (2011) 10.1002/sej.121

[31]

Chrisman "A dynamic framework of noneconomic goals and inter-family agency complexities in multi-family firms" Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (2021) 10.1177/104225872110057

[32]

Chrisman "Nonfamily managers, family firms, and the winner’s curse: the influence of noneconomic goals and bounded rationality" Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (2014) 10.1111/etap.12014

[33]

Defining the Family Business by Behavior

Jess H. Chua, James J. Chrisman, PRAMODITA SHARMA

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1999 10.1177/104225879902300402

[34]

Sources of Heterogeneity in Family Firms: An Introduction

Jess H. Chua, James J. Chrisman, Lloyd P. Steier et al.

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2012 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00540.x

[35]

Combs "Antecedents and consequences of franchising: past accomplishments and future challenges" Journal of Management (2011) 10.1177/0149206310386963

[36]

Cruz "Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: a generational perspective" Small Business Economics (2012) 10.1007/s11187-010-9265-8

[37]

*Cunningham "Knowledge sharing in small family firms: a leadership perspective" Journal of Family Business Strategy (2016) 10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.10.002

[38]

*Cunningham "Perceptions of knowledge sharing among small family firm leaders: a structural equation model" Family Business Review (2017) 10.1177/0894486516682667

[39]

Family Firm Heterogeneity: A Definition, Common Themes, Scholarly Progress, and Directions Forward

Joshua J. Daspit, James J. Chrisman, Triss Ashton et al.

Family Business Review 2021 10.1177/08944865211008350

[40]

Daspit "Governance as a source of family firm heterogeneity" Journal of Business Research (2018) 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.041

[41]

Daspit "Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: a multiphase, multistakeholder review" Family Business Review (2016) 10.1177/0894486515599688

[42]

*Daspit "How familiness affects innovation outcomes via absorptive capacity: a dynamic capability perspective of the family firm" Journal of Family Business Strategy (2019) 10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.003

[43]

Davenport (1998)

[44]

De Massis "Advancing family business research: the promise of microfoundations" Family Business Review (2018) 10.1177/0894486518803422

[45]

De Massis "COVID-19 and the future of family business research" Journal of Management Studies (2020) 10.1111/joms.12632

[46]

Factors Preventing Intra-Family Succession

Alfredo De Massis, Jess H. Chua, James J. Chrisman

Family Business Review 2008 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x

[47]

De Massis "Research on technological innovation in family firms: present debates and future directions" Family Business Review (2013) 10.1177/0894486512466258

[48]

De Massis "Innovation with limited resources: management lessons from the German Mittelstand" Journal of Product Innovation Management (2018) 10.1111/jpim.12373

[49]

De Massis "Innovation through tradition: lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research" Academy of Management Perspectives (2016) 10.5465/amp.2015.0017

[50]

*Debellis "Strategic agility and international joint ventures: the willingness-ability paradox of family firms" Journal of International Management (2021) 10.1016/j.intman.2020.100739

Showing 50 of 161 references

Metrics

3

Citations

161

References

Details

Published: Sep 13, 2021
Vol/Issue: 26(2)
Pages: 291-325

Authors

E

Emma Su

University of Dayton Department of Management and Marketing, , Dayton, Ohio,

J

Joshua Daspit

McCoy College of Business, Texas State University Department of Management, , San Marcos, Texas,

Cite This Article

Emma Su, Joshua Daspit (2021). Knowledge management in family firms: a systematic review, integrated insights and future research opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(2), 291-325. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-08-2020-0658

Knowledge management in family firms: a systematic review, integrated insights and future research opportunities

You May Also Like