Effects of translocation on survival of nuisance bears

J. M. Bauder; D. Ruid; N. M. Roberts; B. Kohn; M. L. Allen

doi:10.1111/acv.12684

journal article Mar 24, 2021

Effects of translocation on survival of nuisance bears

J. M. Bauder

D. Ruid N. M. Roberts B. Kohn M. L. Allen

Animal Conservation Vol. 24 No. 5 pp. 820-831 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/acv.12684

Abstract

AbstractEffective mitigation of human–wildlife conflict should aim to reduce conflicts while also minimizing wildlife mortality. Translocation is often used to mitigate human–wildlife conflict but translocated individuals may have reduced survival, which could negatively affect population growth and social acceptance of translocation as a management tool. Yet, non‐translocated nuisance individuals may also have low survival due to inherent risks associated with nuisance behavior. We used a 38‐year dataset of 1233 marked and translocated nuisance American black bears (Ursus americanus) as a model system with which to evaluate the impacts of translocation on nuisance bear survival. We used multi‐state mark‐recapture models to estimate annual harvest and non‐harvest mortality rates and tested for effects of translocation distance and harvest rate on recapture and both mortality rates. Recapture probability increased with translocation distance but 75% of translocated bears were translocated ≤75 km and recapture probabilities were <0.05 across these distances. Survival was 0.43 for adult males, 0.56 for adult females, and 0.38–0.40 for yearlings. However, increasing translocation distance reduced both harvest and non‐harvest mortality (β = −0.0044, 95% CI = −0.0081 to −0.0006 and β = −0.0020, 95% CI = −0.0051 to 0.0011, respectively) showing that increasing translocation distance does not negatively impact survival. Our survival estimates were generally lower than those reported for non‐nuisance American black bear populations (0.67–0.83), which likely reflects risks associated with nuisance behavior, such as proximity to human dwellings, agriculture, or roads which in turn may increase harvest and/or road mortality. Our results show that translocation is a useful approach for mitigating human–bear conflict that does not always negatively affect survival. Lower survival of nuisance bears suggests that biologists should focus efforts on reducing the incidences of human–wildlife conflicts (e.g., removing anthropogenic food sources).

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

53

[1]

Evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human–bear conflicts in South‐central Colorado

Mat W. Alldredge, Daniel P. Walsh, Linda L. Sweanor et al.

Wildlife Society Bulletin 10.1002/wsb.526

[2]

10.1038/s41598-018-30988-4

[3]

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01599.x

[4]

10.1111/j.1365-2907.2008.00122.x

[5]

10.2193/2007-442

[6]

10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.002

[7]

10.1071/wr19161

[8]

10.1017/s0952836903004126

[9]

10.2307/3802349

[10]

10.1002/jwmg.195

[11]

10.1017/s0030605315000241

[12]

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00102.x

[13]

10.1111/conl.12117

[14]

Clark J.E. "Survival of nuisance American black bears released on‐site in Great Smoky Mountains National Park" Ursus (2003)

[15]

10.2307/3872669

[16]

Curtis J.T. (1959)

[17]

Dhuey B. Walter S.&Koele B.(2017).Wisconsin black bear harvest report 2017.

[18]

10.2307/3801993

[19]

10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0947:sadvit]2.0.co;2

[20]

10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[3476:atfman]2.0.co;2

[21]

Engstrom P. Willging B.&Ruid D.(2015).Black bear damage and nuisance complaints 2015.

[22]

Translocations and human‐carnivore conflicts: problem solving or problem creating?

Francisco E. Fontúrbel, Javier A. Simonetti

Wildlife Biology 10.2981/10-091

[23]

10.1002/cjs.5550360107

[24]

10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00341-5

[25]

Holland K.K. "Characterizing conflict between humans and big cats Panthera spp: A systematic review of research trends and management opportunities" PLoS One (2018) 10.1371/journal.pone.0203877

[26]

10.2192/1537-6176(2007)18[72:gitsca]2.0.co;2

[27]

10.1017/s003060530899030x

[28]

10.1002/jwmg.21304

[29]

Kohn B.E. (1992)

[30]

10.1111/2041-210x.12239

[31]

Kreeger T.J. (2012)

[32]

Laake J.L.(2013).RMark: an R interface for analysis of capture‐recapture data with MARK.). AFSC Processed Rep 2013‐01 25p. Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington.

[33]

10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0123:rconac]2.0.co;2

[34]

Age, Sex and Relocation Distance as Predictors of Return for Relocated Nuisance Black Bears Ursus americanus in Ontario, Canada

Lynn J. Landriault, Glen S. Brown, Josef Hamr et al.

Wildlife Biology 10.2981/07-084

[35]

10.22621/cfn.v120i1.246

[36]

10.2307/2937171

[37]

10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1641:yasbbs]2.0.co;2

[38]

10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.003

[39]

10.1002/wsb.1032

[40]

Translocation of carnivores as a method for managing problem animals: a review

JOHN D. C. LINNELL, RONNY AANES, JON E. SWENSON et al.

Biodiversity and Conservation 10.1023/b:bioc.0000034011.05412.cd

[41]

10.1017/s1367943001001408

[42]

10.1071/wr08179

[43]

10.1002/ecs2.2997

[44]

10.1111/cobi.12859

[45]

R Core Team (2019)

[46]

10.1111/1365-2664.12830

[47]

Rogers L.L. "Effects of translocation distance on frequency of return by adult black bears" Wildl. Soc. Bull. (1986)

[48]

10.1890/03-0012

[49]

10.1093/jmammal/gyw078

[50]

How Agencies Respond to Human–black Bear Conflicts: A Survey of Wildlife Agencies in North America

Rocky D. Spencer, Richard A. Beausoleil, Donald A. Martorello

Ursus 10.2192/1537-6176(2007)18[217:harthb]2.0.co;2

Showing 50 of 53 references

Metrics

8

Citations

53

References

Details

Published: Mar 24, 2021
Vol/Issue: 24(5)
Pages: 820-831
License: View

Authors

J

J. M. Bauder

Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois Champaign IL USA

D

D. Ruid

United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services Rhinelander WI USA

N

N. M. Roberts

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Rhinelander WI USA

B

B. Kohn

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Rhinelander WI USA

M

M. L. Allen

Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois Champaign IL USA

Funding

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Illinois Natural History Survey

Cite This Article

J. M. Bauder, D. Ruid, N. M. Roberts, et al. (2021). Effects of translocation on survival of nuisance bears. Animal Conservation, 24(5), 820-831. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12684

Effects of translocation on survival of nuisance bears

You May Also Like