journal article Aug 27, 2020

SF‐6D utility scores for alcohol use disorder status and alcohol consumption risk levels in the US population

Addiction Vol. 116 No. 5 pp. 1034-1042 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/add.15224
Abstract
AbstractAimsTo estimate US population health utilities for subgroups defined by alcohol use disorder (AUD) status and consumption level.DesignCross‐sectional survey.SettingCommunity settings in the United States (i.e. excluding institutional settings).ParticipantsA total of 36,042 adults (age 18+) in non‐institutional settings in the United States.MeasurementsWe used 12‐item Short Form Survey (SF‐12) data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions–III to calculate mean Short Form–6 dimension (SF‐6D) utility scores across World Health Organization alcohol consumption risk levels—very high risk, high risk, medium risk, low risk and an additional abstinent level—for three groups: (1) the general population (n = 36,042), (2) individuals with life‐time AUD (n = 9925) and (3) individuals with current AUD (n = 5083), and assessed minimally important differences (MIDs) between consumption levels. Each group is a subset of the previous group.FindingsThe general population's mean SF‐6D utility was higher than that of individuals with life‐time or current AUD across all consumption risk levels (0.79 versus 0.76 for both AUD groups). For all groups, SF‐6D utilities increased as consumption risk level decreased to non‐abstinent levels, and reducing consumption from very high risk to any lower level was associated with a statistically significant and meaningful improvement in utility. For individuals with life‐time or current AUD, becoming abstinent from high‐, medium‐ and low‐risk levels was associated with significantly and meaningfully worse utilities.ConclusionsHigher alcohol consumption risk levels appear to be associated with lower health index scores for the general population and individuals with a history of alcohol use disorder, meaning that higher alcohol consumption is associated with worse health‐related quality of life.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
78
[2]
World Health Organization (2014)
[4]
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality.Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. HHS Publication no. SMA 16–4984 NSDUH Series H‐51.2018. Available at:http://www.samhsa.gov/data/(accessed 10 January 2020).
[7]
Pharmacotherapy for Adults With Alcohol Use Disorders in Outpatient Settings

Daniel E. Jonas, Halle R. Amick, Cynthia Feltner et al.

JAMA 10.1001/jama.2014.3628
[8]
Park‐LeeE LipariR. N. HeddenS. L. Kroutil L. A. Porter J. D.Receipt of Services for Substance Use and Mental Health Issues among Adults: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.2017. Available at:http://www.samhsa.gov/data/(accessed 10 January 2020).
[14]
Neumann P. J. (2017)
[15]
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal.2013. Available at:https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/resources/guide-to-the-methods-of-technology-appraisal-2013-pdf-2007975843781(accessed 10 January 2020).
[16]
Cummins R. A. "Preference‐weighted health‐related quality of life measures and substance use disorder severity" Addiction (2008)
[26]
Angus C. "Estimating the cost‐effectiveness of brief interventions for heavy drinking in primary health care across Europe" Eur J Public Health (2017)
[31]
Babor T. F. (2001)
[32]
AUDIT‐C as a Brief Screen for Alcohol Misuse in Primary Care

Katharine A. Bradley, Anna F. DeBenedetti, Robert J. Volk et al.

Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00403.x
[44]
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2015)

Showing 50 of 78 references

Metrics
11
Citations
78
References
Details
Published
Aug 27, 2020
Vol/Issue
116(5)
Pages
1034-1042
License
View
Funding
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Award: R01AA024423
Cite This Article
Carolina Barbosa, Jeremy W. Bray, William N. Dowd, et al. (2020). SF‐6D utility scores for alcohol use disorder status and alcohol consumption risk levels in the US population. Addiction, 116(5), 1034-1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15224
Related

You May Also Like