journal article Open Access Jan 04, 2024

Restricting alcohol marketing to reduce alcohol consumption: A systematic review of the empirical evidence for one of the ‘best buys’

Addiction Vol. 119 No. 5 pp. 799-811 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/add.16411
Abstract
Abstract

Background and Aims
Even though a ban of alcohol marketing has been declared a ‘best buy’ of alcohol control policy, comprehensive systematic reviews on its effectiveness to reduce consumption are lacking. The aim of this paper was to systematically review the evidence for effects of total and partial bans of alcohol marketing on alcohol consumption.


Methods
This descriptive systematic review sought to include all empirical studies that explored how changes in the regulation of alcohol marketing impact on alcohol consumption. The search was conducted between October and December 2022 considering various scientific databases (Web of Science, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase) as well as Google and Google Scholar. The titles and abstracts of a total of 2572 records were screened. Of the 26 studies included in the full text screening, 11 studies were finally included in this review. Changes in consumption in relation to marketing bans were determined based on significance testing in primary studies. Four risk of bias domains (confounding, selection bias, information bias and reporting bias) were assessed.


Results
Seven studies examined changes in marketing restrictions in one location (New Zealand, Thailand, Canadian provinces, Spain, Norway). In the remaining studies, between 17 and 45 locations were studied (mostly high‐income countries from Europe and North America). Of the 11 studies identified, six studies reported null findings. Studies reporting lower alcohol consumption following marketing restrictions were of moderate, serious and critical risk of bias. Two studies with low and moderate risk of bias found increasing alcohol consumption post marketing bans. Overall, there was insufficient evidence to conclude that alcohol marketing bans reduce alcohol consumption.


Conclusions
The available empirical evidence does not support the claim of alcohol marketing bans constituting a best buy for reducing alcohol consumption.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
34
[1]
World Health Organization (2013)
[2]
Babor T. F. (2023)
[12]
CarruthersN.Alcohol ad spend to hit $6bn by 2023 [21 April 2023]. Available from:https://www.thespiritsbusiness.com/2021/05/alcohol-ad-spend-to-hit-6bn-by-2023/
[24]
WellsG. SheaB. O'ConnellD. PetersonJ. WelchV. LososM.et al.The Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta‐analyses [1June 2023]. Available from:https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
[25]
Association of television and radio sales houses.TV Advertising Restrictions & Alcohol Consumption [10 January2023]. Available from:https://www.egta.com/alcohol/documents/tv_ad_restrictions_trends_in_alcohol_consumption_05_11.pdf
[27]
marketing‐BÖRSE. Alkohol‐Werbeausgaben wachsen 2021 mit 5 3 Prozent schneller als der Markt [16/12/2022]. Available from:https://www.marketing-boerse.de/news/details/2121-alkohol-werbeausgaben-wachsen-2021-mit-53-prozent-schneller-als-der-markt/177317
[28]
Nordic Alcohol and Drug Policy Network.Norway—Marketing and advertising [28 December2022]. Available from:https://www.nordicalcohol.org/norway-marketing-and-advertising
Metrics
26
Citations
34
References
Details
Published
Jan 04, 2024
Vol/Issue
119(5)
Pages
799-811
License
View
Cite This Article
Jakob Manthey, Britta Jacobsen, Sinja Klinger, et al. (2024). Restricting alcohol marketing to reduce alcohol consumption: A systematic review of the empirical evidence for one of the ‘best buys’. Addiction, 119(5), 799-811. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16411
Related

You May Also Like