journal article Apr 20, 2025

Dynamics of Farm Size‐Productivity Relationship: Evidence From Semi‐Arid Tropics of India, 1975–2014

Agricultural Economics Vol. 56 No. 6 pp. 874-894 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/agec.70038
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This paper presents new evidence on the relationship between farm size and productivity in India's semi‐arid tropics, utilizing four decades of data (1975–2014) from ICRISAT's village level studies (VLS). In the context of the agricultural development of India's semi‐arid tropics, this period has been associated with a surge in capital‐intensive farming practices and declining crop diversity. We present novel evidence on temporal evolution in the farm size‐productivity and farm size‐efficiency relationship over this period. We control for potential endogeneity of operated land and input use in agriculture by employing fixed effects panel estimation with OLS as well as IV‐GMM estimator in the case of productivity analysis and panel SFA for estimating technical inefficiency. We find that, for both measures of productivity—output value per acre and profit per acre—the inverse farm size‐productivity relationship has weakened over time, coinciding with the persistent crisis in Indian agriculture. We also find that smallholders operate at a lower level of technical efficiency in value of output per acre but not in terms of profit per acre when compared to their larger counterparts. Furthermore, we find that crop diversification has a negative association with both productivity and technical efficiency. Our findings have implications for the agricultural development policy of the semi‐arid tropics.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
72
[5]
Badiani R. S.Dercon P.Krishnan andK. P. C.Rao.2007. “Changes in Living Standards in Villages in India 1975–2004: Revisiting the ICRISAT Village Level Studies.” CPRC Working Paper (85).Chronic Poverty Research Centre. ISBN 1‐904049‐84‐2. 10.2139/ssrn.1653343
[8]
Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India

G. E. Battese, T. J. Coelli

Journal of Productivity Analysis 10.1007/bf00158774
[15]
Chand R. "Farm Size and Productivity: Understanding the Strengths of Smallholders and Improving Their Livelihoods" Economic and Political Weekly (2011)
[16]
Chayanov A. D.Wedgwood Benn(Trans.) andV.Danilov(Trans.).1991.The Theory of Peasant Co‐Operatives.I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755622993. 10.5040/9780755622993
[19]
Dorin B. (2024)
[27]
Government of India (2007)
[33]
Karakaplan M. U.2018. “XTSFKK: Stata Module to Estimate Endogenous Panel Stochastic Frontier Models in the Style of Karakaplan and Kutlu.” Statistical Software Components S458445 Boston College Department of Economics.
[42]
The Number, Size, and Distribution of Farms, Smallholder Farms, and Family Farms Worldwide

Sarah K. Lowder, Jakob Skoet, Terri Raney

World Development 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041
[44]
Mishra S. "Farmers' Suicides in Maharashtra" Economic and Political Weekly (2006)
[46]
Mishra S. (2011)

Showing 50 of 72 references

Metrics
2
Citations
72
References
Details
Published
Apr 20, 2025
Vol/Issue
56(6)
Pages
874-894
License
View
Cite This Article
Rahul Kumar Singh, Sarthak Gaurav, Srijit Mishra (2025). Dynamics of Farm Size‐Productivity Relationship: Evidence From Semi‐Arid Tropics of India, 1975–2014. Agricultural Economics, 56(6), 874-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70038