journal article Sep 02, 2018

Effects of different cryopreservation methods on DNA integrity and sperm chromatin quality in men

Andrology Vol. 6 No. 6 pp. 829-835 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/andr.12529
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundCryopreserved human sperm are used in assisted reproductive technology. However, the effect of cryopreservation on spermDNAintegrity is unclear.ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to: (i) determine the impact of semen cryopreservation on human spermDNAintegrity and chromatin structure; (ii) test if parameters obtained fromTUNELandSCSA® correlate; and (iii) verify correlation between sperm motility, morphology and viability withTUNELandSCSA® parameters.Materials and methodsMen attending a fertility clinic were recruited and grouped according to their sperm parameters (n = 9/group): normozoospermia, oligoasthenoteratozoospermia and teratozoospermia. Each semen sample was processed as follow: (i) directly frozen at −80 °C; (ii) diluted in Sperm Maintenance Medium, cooled for 30 min at 4 °C and frozen at −80 °C; (iii) diluted in Sperm Maintenance Medium; or (iv) in SpermFreeze. Each mixture from method (iii) and (iv) was then suspended for 30 min in liquid nitrogen vapor and plunged into liquid nitrogen. After at least two months of storage, samples were thawed at room temperature and analyzed for motility and viability,TUNELandSCSA® assays.ResultsProgressive motility and viability decreased after freeze‐thawing.TUNELscores increased significantly in all samples after freezing‐thawing while no significant change in theDNAfragmentation index (DFI) fromSCSA® was observed. No change in the percentage highDNAstainability (HDS) was observed in normozoospermic samples; however it was significantly increased in all the methods in oligoasthenoteratozoospermic and in the methods (ii)–(iv) in teratozoospermic samples. TheDFIandTUNELscores correlated significantly with each other and inversely with sperm motility, viability and morphology.Discussion and conclusionCryopreservation seems to be deleterious for the integrity of human spermDNAand compaction. However, the spermDFIwas not affected during cryopreservation under the various methods of storage tested. Clinicians and investigators should take this information into consideration when using cryopreserved sperm for assisted reproduction.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
41
[2]
Anscombe FJ "The transformation of Poisson, binomial, and negative binomial data" Biometrika (1948) 10.1093/biomet/35.3-4.246
[25]
Cryopreservation of Mammalian Sperm: What We Ask Them to Survive

ROY H. HAMMERSTEDT, James K. Graham, JOHN P. NOLAN

Journal of Andrology 1990 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1990.tb01583.x
[26]
Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen

W.V Holt

Animal Reproduction Science 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00152-4
[40]
World Health Organization (2010)
Metrics
62
Citations
41
References
Details
Published
Sep 02, 2018
Vol/Issue
6(6)
Pages
829-835
License
View
Funding
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Award: MOP86636
Cite This Article
M. F. Lusignan, X. Li, B. Herrero, et al. (2018). Effects of different cryopreservation methods on DNA integrity and sperm chromatin quality in men. Andrology, 6(6), 829-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12529