journal article Mar 30, 2020

Impact of sperm characteristics on time‐lapse embryo morphokinetic parameters and clinical outcome of conventional in vitro fertilization

Andrology Vol. 8 No. 5 pp. 1107-1116 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/andr.12781
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundSperm abnormalities may negatively affect embryo development.ObjectivesTo determine the influence of sperm abnormalities (morphology, motility, DNA fragmentation) on embryo morphokinetic variables and clinical outcome of conventional IVF.Materials and methodsParticipants were 86 couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Sperm morphology was evaluated according to the strict criteria proposed by Kruger/Tygerberg. CASA system was applied for sperm motility assessment. Sperm DNA fragmentation was assessed by the chromatin structure assay (SCSA). Morphokinetic parameters were determined in 223 embryos obtained from conventional IVF only and cultured in a single‐step medium using time‐lapse imaging technology.ResultsTime‐lapse variables from the initial embryo development, such as time of pronuclei fading (tPNf) and time for two cells (t2), were those more strongly related with abnormalities of sperm motility, morphology, and DNA fragmentation. Sperm morphological abnormalities rather than sperm motility were more closely associated with embryo morphokinetics. Sperm head defects were mainly correlated with the last stages of embryonic development (t9 to tHB), sperm midpiece defects with intermediate cleaving embryos (t5‐t9), and sperm tail defects with the initial stages of embryonic development (tPNa‐t4). Excess residual cytoplasm was positively correlated with all embryo morphokinetic parameters except t2 and tM. Absence of acrosomes, pinheads, coiled tails, and multiple sperm morphological defects correlated negatively with time‐lapse embryo morphokinetic variables.DiscussionA large number of sperm‐related variables, including frequency of specific morphological defects, morphological indexes, DNA fragmentation and motility, and time‐lapse embryo variables, such as time intervals based mainly of 15 time points were recorded.ConclusionThere were strong associations between specific sperm defects of the head, midpiece, and tail with certain stages of embryonic development from observation of pronuclei to the hatched blastocyst. Coiled tail, cumulative head defects, and multiple abnormalities index (MAI) were associated both with embryo morphokinetics and the implantation success.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
55
[2]
Time-lapse imaging of cleavage divisions in embryo quality assessment

Robert Milewski, Anna Ajduk

Reproduction 10.1530/rep-17-0004
[6]
Time-lapse deselection model for human day 3 in vitro fertilization embryos: the combination of qualitative and quantitative measures of embryo growth

Yanhe Liu, Vincent Chapple, Katie Feenan et al.

Fertility and Sterility 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.003
[8]
Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3

Bjørn Molt Petersen, Mikkel Boel, Markus Montag et al.

Human Reproduction 10.1093/humrep/dew188
[10]
Armstrong S "Time‐lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction" Cochrane Database Syst Rev 29 (2019)
[21]
World Health Organization (2010)
[23]
Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization

Thinus F. Kruger, Anibal A. Acosta, Kathryn F. Simmons et al.

Fertility and Sterility 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59660-5
[40]
Effect of Oxidative Stress on Male Reproduction

Ashok Agarwal, Gurpriya Virk, Chloe Ong et al.

The World Journal of Men's Health 10.5534/wjmh.2014.32.1.1

Showing 50 of 55 references

Metrics
23
Citations
55
References
Details
Published
Mar 30, 2020
Vol/Issue
8(5)
Pages
1107-1116
License
View
Cite This Article
Stefka Nikolova, Dimitar Parvanov, Vilyana Georgieva, et al. (2020). Impact of sperm characteristics on time‐lapse embryo morphokinetic parameters and clinical outcome of conventional in vitro fertilization. Andrology, 8(5), 1107-1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12781