Abstract
AbstractIntroductionEffective male contraceptive options are condoms and vasectomy. Vasectomy should not be considered a reversible method of contraception even if vasovasostomy can be offered to men to restore fertility after vasectomy. Therefore, there is a real questioning among urologists concerning cryopreservation before vasectomy. We carried out an international survey concerning the practice of cryopreservation before vasectomy and during vasovasostomy.Material and methodsAn online anonymous survey was submitted from January to June 2021 to six European urological societies. The 31‐items questionnaire included questions about demography, habits of cryopreservation before vasectomy or during vasectomy reversal, and in case of urogenital cancers.Results228 urologists from six urological societies in five different countries (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, Finland) answered the questionnaire. French urologists were more in favor of cryopreservation before vasectomy than other European urologists (p < 0.0001). They also significantly found that not talking about cryopreservation before vasectomy is a medical fault unlike other urologists (p < 0.0001). The specialization in andrology did not influence the choice of cryopreservation before vasectomy (p = 0.9452). The majority of urologists did not perform intraoperative sperm extraction during vasovasostomy (81%; n = 127) with a significant difference between urologists with or without andrology training (p = 0.0146). Success rates after vasovasostomy are significantly better for robot‐assisted surgery (p = 0.0159) or with a microscope (p = 0.0456) versus without a microscope.ConclusionCryopreservation before definitive sterilization significantly varies among European urologists and seems to be mostly dictated by habits than by knowledge. An international consensus is needed to standardize practices and guide patients’ choices.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
20
[4]
Mayo Clinic.Vasectomy reversal.2020.https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests‐procedures/vasectomy‐reversal/about/pac‐20384537
[10]
Gillois J‐MR P "Utility and paradox of sperm freezing in case of vasectomy: the French CECOS experience" Andrologie (2012)
[11]
Association Française d'Urologie.Contraception masculine.2021.https://www.urofrance.org/congres‐et‐formations/formation‐initiale/referentiel‐du‐college/contraception‐masculine.html
[14]
L'union.Le nombre de vasectomies explose en France : + 491%.2019.https://www.lunion.fr/id96779/article/2019‐09‐27/le‐nombre‐de‐vasectomies‐explose‐en‐france‐491
[15]
CECOS.Préserver sa fertilité.2021.https://www.cecos.org/?page_id=4941
[16]
Dohle GR "Revised guideline ‘Vasectomy’ from the Dutch Urological Association" Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd (2005)
[19]
Moniteur Belge.Texte de loi relatif à la Procréation Médicalement Assistée à destination des embryons surnuméraires et des gamètes.2007.
[20]
Institut Européen de bioéthique.L'Etat affecte chaque année 4 millions d'euros à la congélation des gamètes.2019.
Metrics
9
Citations
20
References
Details
Published
Sep 15, 2022
Vol/Issue
10(7)
Pages
1286-1291
License
View
Authors
Cite This Article
Amandine Degraeve, Thierry Roumeguère, Gilles Tilmans, et al. (2022). European countries have different rates of sperm cryopreservation before vasectomy and at the time of reversal. Andrology, 10(7), 1286-1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13182