journal article Feb 27, 2024

How does intellectual property system affect technology entrepreneurship: evidence from Chinese prefecture‐level cities

Asian-Pacific Economic Literature Vol. 38 No. 1 pp. 110-130 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/apel.12405
Abstract
Technology entrepreneurship plays a pivotal role in bolstering regional economic vitality, with the intellectual property rights (IPR) system serving as a fundamental safeguard for entrepreneurs' intellectual achievements. Using panel data encompassing 260 prefecture‐level cities in China from 2006 to 2019, we employ the count of registered technology‐based enterprises to construct an indicator of technology entrepreneurship and consider China's IPR policy as a quasi‐natural experiment to examine the impact of the IPR system on technology entrepreneurship. The findings reveal that the pilot policy can significantly stimulate technology entrepreneurship displaying a periodically dynamic promotional effect. This conclusion remains reliable even after undergoing rigorous robustness tests. The mechanism analysis demonstrates that the pilot policy can stimulate technology entrepreneurship by enriching the technological knowledge base and providing financial guarantees. Notably, while the policy's impact on technology entrepreneurship increases with the expansion of the city scale across different scenarios, no discernible regional disparities emerge. This study provides a new perspective on the relationship between the IPR system and entrepreneurship, offering valuable insights into improving the IPR framework in emerging developing countries.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
44
[2]
Acs Z.J. (2008)
[5]
Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States

Thorsten Beck, Ross Levine, ALEXEY LEVKOV

The Journal of Finance 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x
[12]
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods

Brantly Callaway, Pedro H.C. Sant’Anna

Journal of Econometrics 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
[13]
Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Clément de Chaisemartin, Xavier D’Haultfœuille

American Economic Review 10.1257/aer.20181169
[14]
de Chaisemartin C.andD'Haultfoeuille X. 2022.Difference‐in difference estimators of intertemporal treatment effects NBER working paper No. 29873. 10.3386/w29873
[18]
Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing

Andrew Goodman-Bacon

Journal of Econometrics 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
[24]
Li J. "The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research: literature review and research directions" Management World (2020)
[25]
Loukil K. "Intellectual property rights, human capital and types of entrepreneurship in emerging and developing countries" Theoretical & Applied Economics (2020)
[33]
Shen G. "The impact of city‐level intellectual property protection on foreign capital entry into Chinese enterprises" Finance & Trade Economics (2019)
[36]
Su J. "Beyond red tape and fools: institutional theory in entrepreneurship research, 1992–2014" Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (2017)
[37]
Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects

Liyang Sun, Sarah Abraham

Journal of Econometrics 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006
[39]
The moderating role of IPR on the relationship between country-level R&D and individual-level entrepreneurial performance

André van Stel, Serhiy Lyalkov, Ana Millán et al.

The Journal of Technology Transfer 10.1007/s10961-019-09731-2
[41]
Wang X.L. (2018)
[43]
Wu H. "Practice and development of China's intellectual property system modernization" China Legal Science (2022)
[44]
Zhang F. "Import competition, service‐oriented manufacturing and corporate performance" China Industrial Economics (2021)
Metrics
4
Citations
44
References
Details
Published
Feb 27, 2024
Vol/Issue
38(1)
Pages
110-130
License
View
Cite This Article
Fusen Zhao, Yuhao Zhao, Silin Li (2024). How does intellectual property system affect technology entrepreneurship: evidence from Chinese prefecture‐level cities. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 38(1), 110-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12405