journal article Open Access Feb 01, 2026

Communicating breastfeeding benefits or formula‐feeding risks? The underlying process explaining the framing effect on infant‐feeding attitudes and intentions

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/aphw.70105
Abstract
Abstract
A preregistered experimental study tested the effects of message framing on breastfeeding and formula‐feeding attitudes and intentions. It also examined whether affective reaction and information acceptance mediated these effects, and whether self‐efficacy and perceived behavioral control (PBC) moderated them. Participants (282 pregnant women) were randomly assigned to a gain frame condition (benefits of breastfeeding), a loss frame condition (risks of not breastfeeding), or a control condition. Results showed two opposite indirect effects: the loss frame elicited negative affect, which lowered information acceptance; and conversely, the gain frame induced positive affect, thus increasing acceptance. These affective and cognitive responses differentially affected breastfeeding and formula‐feeding attitudes and intentions, with the loss frame indirectly worsening the former (95% CI [−.24, −.08]) and improving the latter (95% CI [.03, .11]), while the gain frame worsened formula‐feeding attitudes and intentions (95% CI [−.03, −.01]) and improved those related to breastfeeding (95% CI [.01, .08]). Additionally, low levels of breastfeeding self‐efficacy and PBC amplified the negative effects of the loss‐framed message and suppressed the positive effects of the gain‐framed message. These findings highlight the affective and cognitive mechanisms through which risk‐based language can have unintended, counterproductive effects. Breastfeeding promotion should emphasize benefits rather than risks and empower women's self‐efficacy.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
59
[2]
Bakker E. C. "Message framing effects on breastfeeding attitude: A functional measurement experiment" Psicológica (2014)
[5]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022).Breastfeeding report card: United States.https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding-data/media/pdfs/2024/06/2022-Breastfeeding-Report-Card-508.pdf
[7]
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang et al.

Behavior Research Methods 10.3758/bf03193146
[8]
Health Message Framing Effects on Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior: A Meta-analytic Review

Kristel M. Gallagher, John A. Updegraff

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
[13]
Hayes A. F. (2018)
[14]
Horta B. L. (2013)
[18]
Italian Ministry of Health. (2019).Breastfeeding: an investment for life.https://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_opuscoliPoster_303_allegato.pdf
[25]
Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk

Joan Younger Meek, Lawrence Noble

Pediatrics 10.1542/peds.2022-057988
[28]
Nabi R. L. (2007)
[30]
Breastfeeding in a Global Context: Epidemiology, Impact, and Future Directions

Krysten North, Melanie Gao, Grace Allen et al.

Clinical Therapeutics 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.11.017
[35]
Rogers R. W. (1983)
[36]
Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?

Nigel C Rollins, Nita Bhandari, Nemat Hajeebhoy et al.

The Lancet 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01044-2
[38]
Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing.

Alexander J. Rothman, Peter Salovey

Psychological Bulletin 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
[40]
Optimal breastfeeding practices and infant and child mortality: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Mari Jeeva Sankar, Bireshwar Sinha, Ranadip Chowdhury et al.

Acta Paediatrica 10.1111/apa.13147
[43]
The Intention–Behavior Gap

Paschal Sheeran, Thomas L. Webb

Social and Personality Psychology Compass 10.1111/spc3.12265
[45]
Breastfeeding Rates and Programs in Europe

Melissa A. Theurich, Riccardo Davanzo, Marianne Busck‐Rasmussen et al.

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutritio... 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002234
[47]
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman

Science 10.1126/science.7455683
[49]
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect

Cesar G Victora, Rajiv Bahl, Aluisio J D Barros et al.

The Lancet 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01024-7

Showing 50 of 59 references

Metrics
0
Citations
59
References
Details
Published
Feb 01, 2026
Vol/Issue
18(1)
License
View
Cite This Article
Margherita Guidetti, Giulia Scaglioni, Nicoletta Cavazza (2026). Communicating breastfeeding benefits or formula‐feeding risks? The underlying process explaining the framing effect on infant‐feeding attitudes and intentions. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70105