journal article Open Access Dec 21, 2023

Using machine learning to predict UK and Japanese secondary students' life satisfaction in PISA 2018

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/bjep.12657
Abstract
Abstract

Background
Life satisfaction is a key component of students' subjective well‐being due to its impact on academic achievement and lifelong health. Although previous studies have investigated life satisfaction through different lenses, few of them employed machine learning (ML) approaches.


Objective
Using ML algorithms, the current study predicts secondary students' life satisfaction from individual‐level variables.


Method
Two supervised ML models, random forest (RF) and k‐nearest neighbours (KNN), were developed based on the UK data and the Japan data in PISA 2018.


Results
Findings show that (1) both models yielded better performance on the UK data than on the Japanese data; (2) the RF model outperformed the KNN model in predicting students' life satisfaction; (3) meaning in life, student competition, teacher support, exposure to bullying and ICT resources at home and at school played important roles in predicting students' life satisfaction.


Conclusions
Theoretically, this study highlights the multi‐dimensional nature of life satisfaction and identifies several key predictors. Methodologically, this study is the first to use ML to explore the predictors of life satisfaction. Practically, it serves as a reference for improving secondary students' life satisfaction.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
110
[2]
An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression

N. S. Altman

The American Statistician 10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879
[7]
Bagging predictors

Leo Breiman

Machine Learning 10.1007/bf00058655
[10]
Cawley G. C. "On over‐fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation" The Journal of Machine Learning Research (2010)
[18]
Will Money Increase Subjective Well-Being?

Ed Diener, Robert Biswas-Diener

Social Indicators Research 10.1023/a:1014411319119
[20]
Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well-Being: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluations of Life

Ed Diener, Shigehiro Oishi, Richard E. Lucas

Annual Review of Psychology 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
[25]
Eid M. (2008)
[33]
A review of life satisfaction research with children and adolescents.

Rich Gilman, Scott Huebner

School Psychology Quarterly 10.1521/scpq.18.2.192.21858
[34]
Github Code. (2023).Using‐ML‐to‐predict‐life‐satisfaction [source code]. GitHub.https://github.com/echozpan/Using‐ML‐to‐Predict‐Life‐Satisfaction
[44]
Ho T. K.(1995).Random decision forests. Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition 1 278–282.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994 10.1109/icdar.1995.598994
[46]
Hofstede G. (1980)
[49]
IBM Corp (2020)
[50]
Jaques N. Taylor S. Azaria A. Ghandeharioun A. Sano A. &Picard R.(2015).Predicting students' happiness from physiology phone mobility and behavioral data. 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) 222–228.https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2015.7344575 10.1109/acii.2015.7344575

Showing 50 of 110 references

Metrics
17
Citations
110
References
Details
Published
Dec 21, 2023
Vol/Issue
94(2)
Pages
474-498
License
View
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Award: RES0043209
Alberta Innovates
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Award: RES0062310
Cite This Article
Zexuan Pan, Maria Cutumisu (2023). Using machine learning to predict UK and Japanese secondary students' life satisfaction in PISA 2018. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 474-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12657