journal article Open Access Dec 13, 2023

Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/bjet.13411
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy is at the top of the agenda for education today in developing learners' AI knowledge, skills, attitudes and values in the 21st century. However, there are few validated research instruments for educators to examine how secondary students develop and perceive their learning outcomes. After reviewing the literature on AI literacy questionnaires, we categorized the identified competencies in four dimensions: (1) affective learning (intrinsic motivation and self‐efficacy/confidence), (2) behavioural learning (behavioural commitment and collaboration), (3) cognitive learning (know and understand; apply, evaluate and create) and (4) ethical learning. Then, a 32‐item self‐reported questionnaire on AI literacy (AILQ) was developed and validated to measure students' literacy development in the four dimensions. The design and validation of AILQ were examined through theoretical review, expert judgement, interview, pilot study and first‐ and second‐order confirmatory factor analysis. This article reports the findings of a pilot study using a preliminary version of the AILQ among 363 secondary school students in Hong Kong to analyse the psychometric properties of the instrument. Results indicated a four‐factor structure of the AILQ and revealed good reliability and validity. The AILQ is recommended as a reliable measurement scale for assessing how secondary students foster their AI literacy and inform better instructional design based on the proposed affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical (ABCE) learning framework.






Practitioner notes


What is already known about this topic


AI literacy has drawn increasing attention in recent years and has been identified as an important digital literacy.


Schools and universities around the world started to incorporate AI into their curriculum to foster young learners' AI literacy.


Some studies have worked to design suitable measurement tools, especially questionnaires, to examine students' learning outcomes in AI learning programmes.




What this paper adds


Develops an AI literacy questionnaire (AILQ) to evaluate students' literacy development in terms of affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical (ABCE) dimensions.


Proposes a parsimonious model based on the ABCE framework and addresses a skill set of AI literacy.




Implications for practice and/or policy


Researchers are able to use the AILQ as a guide to measure students' AI literacy.


Practitioners are able to use the AILQ to assess students' AI literacy development.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
101
[2]
Ali S. (2019)
[11]
Caicedo Cavagnis E. "Entrevistas cognitivas: revisión, directrices de uso y aplicación en investigaciones psicológicas" Avaliação Psicológica (2018) 10.15689/ap.2018.1703.14883.09
[12]
Carolus A. Koch M. Straka S. Latoschik M. E. &Wienrich C.(2023).MAILS—Meta AI Literacy Scale: Development and testing of an AI literacy questionnaire based on well‐founded competency models and psychological change‐and meta‐competencies.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.09319 10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014
[14]
CEPIS. (2015).Computing and digital literacy: Call for a holistic approach.http://code.intef.es/wp‐content/uploads/2017/10/position_paper_computing_and_digital_literacy.pdf
[16]
Chai C. S. "Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students" Educational Technology & Society (2021)
[19]
Creation and Evaluation of a Pretertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum

Thomas K. F. Chiu, Helen Meng, Ching-sing Chai et al.

IEEE Transactions on Education 10.1109/te.2021.3085878
[23]
Covello S. "A review of digital literacy assessment instruments" Syracuse University (2010)
[26]
Druga S. Vu S. T. Likhith E. &Qiu T.(2019).Inclusive AI literacy for kids around the world. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019 (pp.104–111). New York USA.https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311904 10.1145/3311890.3311904
[29]
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

Claes Fornell, David F. Larcker

Journal of Marketing Research 10.1177/002224378101800104
[31]
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

Jörg Henseler, Christian M. Ringle, Marko Sarstedt

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
[39]
Kim M. "Development of youth digital citizenship scale and implication for educational setting" Journal of Educational Technology & Society (2018)
[42]
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence literacy course for university students with diverse study backgrounds

Siu-Cheung Kong, William Man-Yin Cheung, Guo Zhang

Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100026
[43]
Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies

Mona Ashok, Rohit Madan, Anton Joha et al.

International Journal of Information Management 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433
[45]
Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review

Matthias Carl Laupichler, Alexandra Aster, Jana Schirch et al.

Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101
[46]
Law N. (2018)
[49]
Lemov D.(2017 April 3).Bloom's taxonomy: That pyramid is a problem[Blog post].http://teachlikeachampion.com/blog/blooms‐taxonomy‐pyramidproblem/

Showing 50 of 101 references

Cited By
220
An assessment of artificial intelligence literacy in Ecuadorian university students

Douglas Andrés Verduga-Alcívar, Eldis Román-Cao · 2026

Social Sciences & Humanities Op...
Metrics
220
Citations
101
References
Details
Published
Dec 13, 2023
Vol/Issue
55(3)
Pages
1082-1104
License
View
Cite This Article
Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Wenjie Wu, Jac Ka Lok Leung, et al. (2023). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1082-1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411
Related

You May Also Like