journal article Open Access Jul 23, 2020

Preference for Intuition and Deliberation in Eating Decision‐making: Scale validation and associations with eating behaviour and health

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/bjhp.12460
Abstract
Objectives
Two distinct lines of research separately regard either deliberately regulated eating or intuitive eating as most beneficial for health. The present research aims to integrate these seemingly contradictory findings by investigating the relationships between Preference for Intuition and Deliberation in Eating Decision‐making (E‐PID) and subjective and objective health‐related parameters using a newly developed scale.


Design
Study 1: online survey; Study 2: cross‐sectional community cohort sample.


Methods

Study 1 (
N
 = 699) assessed E‐PID, intuitive, restrained, and external eating, motivation to eat healthily, domain‐unspecific Preference for Intuition and Deliberation, and general self‐control. Study 2 (
N
 = 1,212) assessed E‐PID, positive eating, intention to eat healthily, eating behaviour, and objective health risk factors (BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting serum glucose, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides).



Results
Study 1 confirmed a two‐factor structure and provided evidence for construct validity: A higher preference for intuition was positively related to intuitive eating, while a higher preference for deliberation was associated with increased dietary restraint. In Study 2, preference for deliberation was positively related to the intention to eat healthy, healthy eating behaviour, and health parameters. Preference for intuition was generally unrelated to health parameters, although a higher preference for intuition was related to a somewhat unhealthier eating pattern.


Conclusions
Preference for intuition and deliberation when making food choices are two distinct decision‐making styles: The former focuses on internal cues, while the latter focuses on cognitive regulation of food intake. Despite these differences, neither decision‐making style was shown to be detrimental.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
94
[2]
The theory of planned behavior

Icek Ajzen

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process... 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
[6]
Bamman M. M. (2014)
[7]
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective

Albert Bandura

Annual Review of Psychology 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
[14]
Cadena‐Schlam L. "Intuitive eating: An emerging approach to eating behavior" Nutricion Hospitalaria (2015)
[17]
A power primer.

Jacob Cohen

Psychological Bulletin 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
[18]
Multiple correlations and bonferroni’s correction

François Curtin, Pierre Schulz

Biological Psychiatry 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00043-2
[19]
Davis C. M. "Results of the self‐selection of diets by young children" Canadian Medical Association Journal (1939)
[22]
The metabolic syndrome

Robert H Eckel, Scott M Grundy, Paul Z Zimmet

The Lancet 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66378-7
[26]
Heuristic Decision Making

Gerd Gigerenzer, Wolfgang Gaissmaier

Annual Review of Psychology 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
[28]
Grunert S. C. "Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von Selbstaussagen zum Ernährungsverhalten" Diagnostica (1989)
[39]
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

Li‐tze Hu, Peter M. Bentler

Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary... 10.1080/10705519909540118
[40]
International Diabetes Federation (2006)
[46]
Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes

Vasanti S. Malik, Barry M. Popkin, George A. Bray et al.

Diabetes Care 10.2337/dc10-1079
[48]
McKinney J. "The health benefits of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness" British Columbia Medical Journal (2016)
[49]
A weight-neutral versus weight-loss approach for health promotion in women with high BMI: A randomized-controlled trial

Janell L. Mensinger, Rachel M. Calogero, Saverio Stranges et al.

Appetite 10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.006
[50]

Showing 50 of 94 references

Metrics
12
Citations
94
References
Details
Published
Jul 23, 2020
Vol/Issue
26(1)
Pages
109-131
License
View
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Award: SP 1610/2‐1
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Award: 01EL1420A
Cite This Article
Laura M. König, Gudrun Sproesser, Harald T. Schupp, et al. (2020). Preference for Intuition and Deliberation in Eating Decision‐making: Scale validation and associations with eating behaviour and health. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26(1), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12460