journal article Feb 18, 2015

Let Us Not Throw Out the Baby With the Bathwater: Applying the Principle of Universalism Without Uniformity to Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Parenting

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/cdep.12103
Abstract
Abstract
Socialization scholars differ in how they view parenting processes: On one hand, scholars working from the perspective of the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) underscore the universally growth-promoting role of parenting that is perceived to support autonomy and the universal costs associated with parenting that is perceived as controlling. On the other hand, scholars adopting a more relativistic perspective focus on moderating factors (e.g., personality, culture) that may reduce or even cancel out the benefits of parents' support of autonomy and the costs of controlling parenting. In this article, we apply the principle of universalism without uniformity to this literature and review evidence for this principle. Specifically, we maintain that room for individual differences exists within SDT in children's appraisal of potentially autonomy-supportive and controlling parenting practices, and in the way they cope with controlling parenting. This perspective emphasizes children's active contribution in shaping the socialization process.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
37
[1]
Deci "The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior" Psychological Inquiry (2000) 10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
[2]
Grolnick (1997)
[3]
Baumrind "Effects of authoritative parental control on child behaviour" Child Development (1966) 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1966.tb05416.x
[4]
Gray "Unpacking authoritative parenting: Reassessing a multidimensional construct" Journal of Marriage and the Family (1999) 10.2307/353561
[5]
Soenens "Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning" Developmental Psychology (2007) 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.633
[6]
Barber "Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct" Child Development (1996) 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01915.x
[7]
Grolnick "Issues and challenges in studying parental control: Toward a new conceptualization" Child Development Perspectives (2009) 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00099.x
[8]
Joussemet "A self-determination theory perspective on parenting" Canadian Psychology (2008) 10.1037/a0012754
[9]
Soenens "A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory" Developmental Review (2010) 10.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001
[10]
Grusec (2008)
[11]
Markus "Does choice mean freedom and well-being?" Journal of Consumer Research (2010) 10.1086/651242
[12]
Rothbaum (2007)
[13]
Kiff "Nature and nurturing: Parenting in the context of child temperament" Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (2011) 10.1007/s10567-011-0093-4
[14]
Van Leeuwen "Child personality and parental behavior as moderators of problem behavior: Variable- and person-centered approaches" Developmental Psychology (2004) 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1028
[15]
Schweder "Cultural psychology: Who needs it?" Annual Review of Psychology (1993) 10.1146/annurev.psych.44.1.497
[16]
Wang "The role of parents' control in early adolescents' psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China" Child Development (2007) 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01085.x
[17]
Kuczynski (2007)
[18]
Deci "The support of autonomy and the control of behavior" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1987) 10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1024
[19]
Patall "The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings" Psychological Bulletin (2008) 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
[20]
Iyengar "Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1999) 10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.349
[21]
Qin "Are gains in decision-making autonomy during early adolescence beneficial for emotional functioning? The case of the United States and China" Child Development (2009) 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01363.x
[22]
Sheldon "Understanding well-being and optimal functioning: Applying the Multilevel Personality in Context (MPIC) Model" Psychological Inquiry (2011) 10.1080/1047840x.2011.532477
[23]
Vansteenkiste "Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing?" Journal of Educational Psychology (2005) 10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468
[24]
Marbell "Correlates of parental control and autonomy support in an interdependent culture: A look at Ghana" Motivation and Emotion (2013) 10.1007/s11031-012-9289-2
[25]
Chao "Interpretations of parental control by Asian immigrant and European American youth" Journal of Family Psychology (2009) 10.1037/a0015828
[26]
Helwig "Judgments and reasoning about parental discipline involving induction and psychological control in China and Canada" Child Development (2014) 10.1111/cdev.12183
[27]
Ahmad "The relations of Arab Jordanian adolescents' perceived maternal parenting to teacher-rated adjustment and problems: The intervening role of perceived need satisfaction" Developmental Psychology (2013) 10.1037/a0027837
[28]
Pomerantz "The role of parental control in children's development in Western and East Asian countries" Current Directions in Psychological Science (2009) 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01653.x
[29]
Grolnick "Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1987) 10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890
[30]
Vansteenkiste "Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and internally controlling versus autonomy-supportive communication style upon early adolescents' academic achievement" Child Development (2005) 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x
[31]
Skinner (2002)
[32]
Skinner "Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping" Psychological Bulletin (2003) 10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216
[33]
Vansteenkiste "Longitudinal associations between adolescent perceived degree and style of parental prohibition and internalization and defiance" Developmental Psychology (2014) 10.1037/a0032972
[34]
Van Petegem "Rebels with a cause? Adolescent reactance considered from the perspective of psychological reactance theory and self-determination theory" Child Development
[35]
Cicchetti "Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology" Development and Psychopathology (1996) 10.1017/s0954579400007318
[36]
Masten "Developmental cascades" Development and Psychopathology (2010) 10.1017/s0954579410000222
[37]
Kakihara "Adolescents' interpretations of parental control: Differentiated by domain and types of control" Child Development (2009) 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01364.x
Metrics
226
Citations
37
References
Details
Published
Feb 18, 2015
Vol/Issue
9(1)
Pages
44-49
License
View
Cite This Article
Bart Soenens, Maarten Vansteenkiste, Stijn Van Petegem (2015). Let Us Not Throw Out the Baby With the Bathwater: Applying the Principle of Universalism Without Uniformity to Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Parenting. Child Development Perspectives, 9(1), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12103
Related

You May Also Like

Emerging Adulthood: What Is It, and What Is It Good For?

Jeffrey Jensen Arnett · 2007

1,565 citations

Hot and Cool Executive Function in Childhood and Adolescence: Development and Plasticity

Philip David Zelazo, Stephanie M Carlson · 2012

984 citations

Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research

Carolyn J Hill, Howard S Bloom · 2008

615 citations

Fathers Are Parents, Too! Widening the Lens on Parenting for Children's Development

Natasha J Cabrera, Brenda L Volling · 2018

603 citations