Abstract
Abstract
An important rationale for legally farmed and synthetic wildlife products is that they reduce illegal, wild‐sourced trade by supplying markets with sustainable alternatives. For this to work, more established illegal‐product consumers must switch to legal alternatives than new legal‐product consumers switch to illegal wild products. Despite the widespread debate on the magnitude and direction of switching, studies among actual consumers are lacking. We used an anonymous online survey of 1421 traditional Chinese medicine consumers in China to investigate switching among legal farmed, synthetic, and illegal wild bear bile. We examined the past consumption behavior, applied a discrete choice experiment framed within worsening hypothetical disease scenarios, and used latent class models to investigate groups with shared preferences. Bear bile consumers (86% respondents) were wealthier, more likely to have family who consumed bile, and less knowledgeable about bile treatments than nonconsumers. Consumer preferences were heterogenous, but most consumer preferences switched between bile types as disease worsened. We identified five distinct latent classes within our sample: law‐abiding consumers (34% respondents), who prefer legal products and were unlikely to switch; two all‐natural consumer groups (53%), who dislike synthetics but may switch between farmed and wild; and two nonconsumer groups (12%), who prefer not to buy bile. People with past experience of bile consumption had different preferences than those without. Willingness to switch to wild products was related to believing they were legal, although the likelihood of switching was mediated by preferences for cheaper products sold in legal, familiar places. We found that consumers of wild bile may switch to legal alternatives, given the availability of a range of products, whereas legal‐product consumers may switch to illegal products if the barriers to doing so are small. Understanding preferences that promote or impede switching should be a key consideration when attempting to predict consumer behavior in complex wildlife markets.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
47
[1]
Barton K.(2019). MuMIn: Multi‐model inference. R package version 1.43.6.
[4]
Choicemetrics.(2018). Ngene 1.2. Sydney Australia.http://www.choice‐metrics.com/NgeneManual120.pdf
[11]
Labeled versus Unlabeled Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening

Esther W. de Bekker-Grob, Lieke Hol, Bas Donkers et al.

Value in Health 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00670.x
[12]
Degner L. F. "Control preference scale" Canadian Journal of Nursing Resources (1997)
[16]
Garshelis D. &Steinmetz R.(2020).Ursus thibetanus(amended version of 2016 assessment). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020.Gland Switzerland:International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
[24]
Huang H. &Li Z.(2007).Bear farming and bear conservation in China. InProceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the Trade in Bear Parts. TRAFFIC pp.37–49.
[25]
IBM Corp. Released(2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 25.0. Armonk NY: IBMCorp.
[27]
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies

Robert J. Johnston, Kevin J. Boyle, Wiktor (Vic) Adamowicz et al.

Journal of the Association of Environmental and Re... 10.1086/691697
[32]
Liu Z. "Do consumers prefer wild, farmed bear bile or substitutes" Journal of Biodiversity and Endangered Species (2015)
[36]
National Pharmacopeia Committee. (2015)
[38]
NFGA (2017)
[39]
NHS(2019). Treatment: Primary biliary cholangitis (primary biliary cirrhosis).https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/primary-biliary-cirrhosis-pbc/treatment/
[41]
R Core Team.(2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. RFoundation for Statistical Computing.https://www.R-project.org
[43]
Statistical Innovations.(2019). Latent Gold 5.1.https://www.statisticalinnovations.com/
Cited By
17
Metrics
17
Citations
47
References
Details
Published
Apr 29, 2022
Vol/Issue
36(3)
License
View
Cite This Article
Amy Hinsley, Anita Kar Yan Wan, David Garshelis, et al. (2022). Understanding why consumers in China switch between wild, farmed, and synthetic bear bile products. Conservation Biology, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13895
Related

You May Also Like

Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review

DENIS A. SAUNDERS, Richard J. Hobbs · 1991

2,756 citations

Habitat Loss and Extinction in the Hotspots of Biodiversity

Thomas M. Brooks, Russell A. Mittermeier · 2002

1,394 citations

Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation

William F. Laurance, Thomas E. Lovejoy · 2002

1,297 citations