journal article Feb 02, 2024

Prioritizing conservation efforts based on future habitat availability and accessibility under climate change

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/cobi.14204
Abstract
Abstract
The potential for species to shift their ranges to avoid extinction is contingent on the future availability and accessibility of habitats with analogous climates. To develop conservation strategies, many previous researchers used a single method that considered individual factors; a few combined 2 factors. Primarily, these studies focused on identifying climate refugia or climatically connected and spatially fixed areas, ignoring the range shifting process of animals. We quantified future habitat availability (based on species occurrence, climate data, land cover, and elevation) and accessibility (based on climate velocity) under climate change (4 scenarios) of migratory birds across the Yangtze River basin (YRB). Then, we assessed species’ range‐shift potential and identified conservation priority areas for migratory birds in the 2050s with a network analysis. Our results suggested that medium (i.e., 5–10 km/year) and high (i.e., ≥ 10 km/year) climate velocity would threaten 18.65% and 8.37% of stable habitat, respectively. Even with low (i.e., 0–5 km/year) climate velocity, 50.15% of climate‐velocity‐identified destinations were less available than their source habitats. Based on our integration of habitat availability and accessibility, we identified a few areas of critical importance for conservation, mainly in Sichuan and the middle to lower reaches of the YRB. Overall, we identified the differences between habitat availability and accessibility in capturing biological responses to climate change. More importantly, we accounted for the dynamic process of species’ range shifts, which must be considered to identify conservation priority areas. Our method informs forecasting of climate‐driven distribution shifts and conservation priorities.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
69
[4]
Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks

Mathieu Bastian, Sebastien Heymann, Mathieu Jacomy

Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference o... 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
[10]
Csardi G. "The igraph software package for complex network research" Inter Journal, Complex Systems (2006)
[14]
A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists

Jane Elith, Steven J. Phillips, Trevor Hastie et al.

Diversity and Distributions 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
[23]
IUCN. (2022).Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 15.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. Available fromhttps://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf
[32]
The velocity of climate change

Scott R. Loarie, Philip B. Duffy, Healy Hamilton et al.

Nature 10.1038/nature08649
[40]
Ni J. "An ecogeographical regionalization for biodiversity in China" Acta Botanica Sinica (1998)

Showing 50 of 69 references

Metrics
6
Citations
69
References
Details
Published
Feb 02, 2024
Vol/Issue
38(3)
License
View
Authors
Cite This Article
Jie Liang, Wenhan Wang, Qing Cai, et al. (2024). Prioritizing conservation efforts based on future habitat availability and accessibility under climate change. Conservation Biology, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14204
Related

You May Also Like

Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review

DENIS A. SAUNDERS, Richard J. Hobbs · 1991

2,756 citations

Habitat Loss and Extinction in the Hotspots of Biodiversity

Thomas M. Brooks, Russell A. Mittermeier · 2002

1,394 citations

Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation

William F. Laurance, Thomas E. Lovejoy · 2002

1,297 citations