journal article Open Access Jun 11, 2019

Bioacoustic monitoring of animal vocal behavior for conservation

Abstract
Abstract
The popularity of bioacoustics for threatened species monitoring has surged. Large volumes of acoustic data can be collected autonomously and remotely with minimal human effort. The approach is commonly used to detect cryptic species and, more recently, to estimate abundance or density. However, the potential for conservation‐relevant information to be derived from acoustic signatures associated with particular behavior is less well‐exploited. Animal vocal behavior can reveal important information about critical life history events. In this study, we argue that the overlap of the disciplines of bioacoustics, vocal communication, and conservation behavior—thus, “acoustic conservation behavior”—has much to offer threatened species monitoring. In particular, vocalizations can serve as indicators of behavioral states and contexts that provide insight into populations as it relates to their conservation. We explore the information available from monitoring species' vocalizations that relate to reproduction and recruitment, alarm and defense, and social behavior, and how this information could translate into potential conservation benefits. While there are still challenges to processing acoustic data, we conclude that acoustic conservation behavior may improve threatened species monitoring where vocalizations reveal behaviors that are informative for management and decision‐making.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
160
[7]
The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms

Jesse R. Barber, Kevin R. Crooks, Kurt M. Fristrup

Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002
[8]
Integrating animal behavior and conservation biology: a conceptual framework

O. Berger-Tal, T. Polak, A. Oron et al.

Behavioral Ecology 10.1093/beheco/arq224
[10]
Blumstein D. T. (2010)
[15]
Bradbury J. W. (2011)
[17]
Buchholz R. (1997)
[31]
Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals. (2017). Conservation implications of animal culture and social complexity. Paper presented at the 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties. UN Environment Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Manila Philippines.
[32]
Cornell Lab of Ornithology. (2019). Macaulay Library. Retrived fromhttps://www.macaulaylibrary.org/
[33]
Courtney J. "The juvenile food‐begging calls, food‐swallowing vocalisations and begging postures in Australian cockatoos" Australian Bird Watcher (1996)
[34]
Cragg J. L. "Testing the effectiveness of automated acoustic sensors for monitoring vocal activity of marbled murrelets Brachyramphus marmoratus" Marine Ornithology (2015) 10.5038/2074-1235.43.2.1124
[43]
Festa‐Bianchet M. (2003)

Showing 50 of 160 references

Cited By
94
Frontiers in Bird Science
Metrics
94
Citations
160
References
Details
Published
Jun 11, 2019
Vol/Issue
1(8)
License
View
Cite This Article
Daniella Teixeira, Martine Maron, Berndt J. van Rensburg (2019). Bioacoustic monitoring of animal vocal behavior for conservation. Conservation Science and Practice, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.72
Related

You May Also Like

Declines in insect abundance and diversity: We know enough to act now

Matthew L. Forister, Emma M. Pelton · 2019

255 citations

Ecosystem integrity is neither real nor valuable

Yasha Rohwer, Emma Marris · 2021

61 citations

Green but not altruistic warm‐glow predicts conservation behavior

Lili Jia, Sander van der Linden · 2020

38 citations

Rapid changes in public perception toward a conservation initiative

Rebecca Niemiec, Richard E. W. Berl · 2022

34 citations