journal article Jun 27, 2014

Europe's freshwater biodiversity under climate change: distribution shifts and conservation needs

Diversity and Distributions Vol. 20 No. 9 pp. 1097-1107 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/ddi.12232
Abstract
AbstractAimTo assess the future climatic suitability of European catchments for freshwater species and the future utility of the current network of protected areas.LocationEurope.MethodsUsing recently updated catchment‐scale species data and climate projections from multiple climate models, we assessed the climate change threat by the 2050s for 1648 European freshwater plants, fishes, molluscs, odonates, amphibians, crayfish and turtles for two dispersal scenarios and identified hotspots of change at three spatial scales: major river basins, countries and freshwater ecoregions. We considered both common species and the often overlooked rare species. To set our findings within the context of current and future conservation networks, we evaluated the coverage of freshwater biodiversity by Europe's protected area network.ResultsSix per cent of common and 77% of rare species are predicted to lose more than 90% of their current range. Eight fish species and nine mollusc species are predicted to experience 100% range loss under climate change. As the most species‐rich group, molluscs are particularly vulnerable due to the high proportion of rare species and their relatively limited ability to disperse. Furthermore, around 50% of molluscs and fish species will have no protected area coverage given their projected distributions.Main conclusionsWe identified the species most at threat due to projected changes in both catchment suitability and representation within the European protected area network. Our findings suggest an urgent need for freshwater management plans to facilitate adaptation to climate change.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
45
[1]
Freshwater Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Biogeographic Units for Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation

Robin Abell, Michele L. Thieme, Carmen Revenga et al.

BioScience 10.1641/b580507
[3]
Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS)

OMRI ALLOUCHE, ASAF TSOAR, RONEN KADMON

The Journal of Applied Ecology 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
[16]
R Development Core Team (2012)
[24]
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas

ROBERT J. HIJMANS, Susan E. Cameron, Juan L. Parra et al.

International Journal of Climatology 10.1002/joc.1276
[26]
IUCN (2012)
[29]
Lehner B.. (2012)Global watershed boundaries and sub‐basin delineation derived from HydroSHEDS data at 15 second resolution. Technical Documentation.
[31]
The velocity of climate change

Scott R. Loarie, Philip B. Duffy, Healy Hamilton et al.

Nature 10.1038/nature08649
[35]
Nakicenovic N. (2000)
[39]
Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity

Ana S. L. Rodrigues, Sandy J. Andelman, Mohamed I. Bakarr et al.

Nature 10.1038/nature02422
Metrics
139
Citations
45
References
Details
Published
Jun 27, 2014
Vol/Issue
20(9)
Pages
1097-1107
License
View
Funding
European Commission Award: 226874
Cite This Article
Danijela Marković, Savrina Carrizo, Jörg Freyhof, et al. (2014). Europe's freshwater biodiversity under climate change: distribution shifts and conservation needs. Diversity and Distributions, 20(9), 1097-1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12232
Related

You May Also Like

A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists

Jane Elith, Steven J. Phillips · 2010

5,285 citations

Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models

M. S. Wisz, R. J. Hijmans · 2008

2,000 citations

Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect

Robert J. Whittaker, Miguel B. Araújo · 2005

946 citations