journal article Open Access Oct 10, 2022

Citizen science reveals meteorological determinants of frog calling at a continental scale

Diversity and Distributions Vol. 28 No. 11 pp. 2375-2387 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/ddi.13634
Abstract
AbstractAimHere we investigate the strength of the relationships between meteorological factors and calling behaviour of 100 Australian frog species using continent‐wide citizen science data. First, we use this dataset to quantify the meteorological factors that best predict frog calling. Second, we investigate the strength of interactions among predictor variables. Third, we assess whether frog species cluster into distinct groups based on shared drivers of calling.LocationAustralia.MethodTo assess the relationship between calling and meteorological traits, we used spatio‐temporal subsampling (daily data fitted to 10 km2grid cells) of call and meteorological data as inputs to a boosted regression tree. We scaled the model outputs, which created a descriptive ranking of predictor importance. For strongly day‐driven species, we conducted further analyses to examine the influences of meteorological factors within the breeding season.ResultsWe found a strong seasonal signal, with day of year the strongest relationship to calling in 67 out of our 100 species, moderate relationships between temperature and calling, and weak relationships between rainfall and calling. Despite the common narratives, we found that frogs did not group into distinct categories based upon the influence of meteorological factors. For strongly day‐driven species, we found similar patterns within the breeding season.Main conclusionsWe demonstrate the importance of day of year and temperature thresholds in predicting frog calling behaviour in Australia. Understanding how meteorological conditions influence phenological events, such as breeding, will be increasingly important considering the rapid changes in environmental conditions and stability throughout most of the world, and how important breeding is to species survival.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
88
[9]
Bureau of Meteorology (BOM)(2020)”Climate Data Onlinehttp://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/?ref=ftr. Verified 28 September 2021.
[10]
Bureau of Meteorology (BOM)(2021)”Gridded Köppen classification metadata.http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/climatology/gridded‐data‐info/metadata/md_koppen_classification.shtml. Verified 28 September 2021.
[11]
Thermal flexibility and a generalist life history promote urban affinity in butterflies

Corey T. Callaghan, Diana E. Bowler, Henrique M. Pereira

Global Change Biology 10.1111/gcb.15670
[22]
Dorcas M. E. "Environmental effects on anuran advertisement calling" American Zoologist (1991)
[23]
[27]
A working guide to boosted regression trees

J. Elith, J. R. Leathwick, T. Hastie

Journal of Animal Ecology 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
[36]
Gotthard K. (2001)
[42]
Hijmans R. J. "Dismo: Species distribution modeling" R Package Version (2021)
[48]
Kassambara A. "R package ‘factoextra’" Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses, 1.0.7 (2020)

Showing 50 of 88 references

Related

You May Also Like

A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists

Jane Elith, Steven J. Phillips · 2010

5,285 citations

Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models

M. S. Wisz, R. J. Hijmans · 2008

2,000 citations

Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect

Robert J. Whittaker, Miguel B. Araújo · 2005

946 citations