Conditional cash transfers: A critical review
Motivation
In areas of the world where poverty and inequality are deep and pervasive and social protection systems comparatively fragile, cash transfers are becoming commonplace and often promoted by international institutions and aid agencies as a viable instrument for social protection. Particularly, conditional cash transfers (CCTs) are being looked to as a means of reducing poverty while also investing in human capital.
Purpose
To capture some of the main critiques of CCTs from conception to evaluation, while identifying both gaps and opportunities for research and consideration for the future of CCTs.
Methods
A rapid review process was used. The initial search was conducted using a number of online peer‐reviewed databases. The initial search process yielded 993 sources, results were then limited to full‐text, English language, and to sources published between 2008 and 2017. Sources were then screened. Finally, 44 articles were chosen for in‐depth review.
Findings
This review captures some of the main critiques of CCTs from conception to evaluation, while identifying both gaps and opportunities for research and consideration for the future of CCTs.
Policy implication
We discuss responsibilities and implications for social work professionals who may be involved in the design, implementation or evaluation of CCT programmes domestically or internationally.
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
Guy Standing
- Published
- Oct 25, 2019
- Vol/Issue
- 38(1)
- Pages
- 28-41
- License
- View
You May Also Like
Brian Belcher, Kathrin Schreckenberg · 2007
291 citations
Mark Robinson · 2013
141 citations
Deborah Fahy Bryceson, Annabel Bradbury · 2008
119 citations
Adriana Keating, Karen Campbell · 2016
98 citations