journal article
Open Access
Mar 29, 2026
The Very Idea of Seriousness
Abstract
Abstract
What norms govern aesthetic conversations? In Hansen and Adams (2024), we argue for a norm we call, following Stanley Cavell, “the hope of agreement”, along with a requirement of “seriousness”, the “discipline of accounting for one's judgments”. Nick Riggle criticizes the hope of agreement and the requirement of seriousness and defends a norm of “community” in which aesthetic conversations involve “discretionary valuing” in a “mutually supportive way”. In this essay, we elaborate on the importance of seriousness as a constitutive norm for aesthetic conversations. We argue that conversations can satisfy Riggle's community norm without being aesthetic conversations, and that his rejection of seriousness leads him to miss what is distinctive about aesthetic conversation. A fundamental problem with Riggle's “communitarian” theory of aesthetic value and norms governing aesthetic conversations is that it is in fact much more individualistic than conversations governed by the hope of agreement and seriousness. We propose that the kind of community involved in aesthetic conversations is better understood as a
democratic experiment
.
What norms govern aesthetic conversations? In Hansen and Adams (2024), we argue for a norm we call, following Stanley Cavell, “the hope of agreement”, along with a requirement of “seriousness”, the “discipline of accounting for one's judgments”. Nick Riggle criticizes the hope of agreement and the requirement of seriousness and defends a norm of “community” in which aesthetic conversations involve “discretionary valuing” in a “mutually supportive way”. In this essay, we elaborate on the importance of seriousness as a constitutive norm for aesthetic conversations. We argue that conversations can satisfy Riggle's community norm without being aesthetic conversations, and that his rejection of seriousness leads him to miss what is distinctive about aesthetic conversation. A fundamental problem with Riggle's “communitarian” theory of aesthetic value and norms governing aesthetic conversations is that it is in fact much more individualistic than conversations governed by the hope of agreement and seriousness. We propose that the kind of community involved in aesthetic conversations is better understood as a
democratic experiment
.
Topics
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
References
29
[1]
Ayer A. J. "Can There Be a Private Language?" Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes (1954) 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/28.1.63
[2]
Baxandall M. (1985)
[3]
Cavell S. (1976)
[4]
Cavell S. (1981)
[5]
Cavell S. "Politics as Opposed to What?" Critical Inquiry (1982) 10.1086/448193
[6]
Cavell S. (2005) 10.4159/9780674260733
[7]
Clark T. J. (2008)
[8]
Clark T. J. (2022)
[9]
Man P. (1979)
[10]
Ebert R.(2012) ‘Critic is a Four‐Letter Word’ https://www.rogerebert.com/roger‐ebert/critic‐is‐a‐four‐letter‐word
[11]
Fridman V. "Conspicuous Openness to Diversity and Cosmopolitanism" Sociologie et Sociètès (2004)
[12]
Gurstein R. (2024)
[13]
Hansen N. "The Hope of Agreement: Against Vibing Accounts of Aesthetic Judgment" Mind (2024) 10.1093/mind/fzad055
[14]
Khoo J.(2022) ‘How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Chrisopher Nolan's $200 Million‐Dollar Sudoku Puzzles’ Reactor https://reactormag.com/how‐i‐learned‐to‐stop‐worrying‐and‐love‐christopher‐nolans‐200‐million‐dollar‐sudoku‐puzzles/
[15]
Marx W. D. (2025)
[16]
Merrill L. (1992)
[17]
Mitchell J. (1965)
[18]
Moi T. (2017) 10.7208/chicago/9780226464589.001.0001
[19]
Nguyen C. T. "Autonomy and Aesthetic Engagement" Mind (2020) 10.1093/mind/fzz054
[20]
Nguyen C. T.(2023) ‘Art as a Shelter from Science’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume XCVII:172–201.
10.1093/arisup/akad007
[21]
Ollivier M. "Revisiting Distinction: Bourdieu without Class?" Journal of Cultural Economy (2008) 10.1080/17530350802476970
[22]
Peterson R. A. "Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore" American Sociological Review (1996) 10.2307/2096460
[23]
Riggle N. "‘Convergence, Community, and Force in Aesthetic Discourse’, Ergo: An Open Access" Journal of Philosophy (2021)
[24]
Riggle N. "Toward a Communitarian Theory of Aesthetic Value" Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (2022) 10.1093/jaac/kpab060
[25]
Riggle N. "Aesthetic Value and the Practice of Aesthetic Valuing" The Philosophical Review (2024) 10.1215/00318108-11251345
[26]
Riggle N. "Can't Kill the Vibe: Against Hope in Aesthetic Discourse" Mind (2026) 10.1093/mind/fzaf013
[27]
Seaver N. (2022) 10.7208/chicago/9780226822969.001.0001
[28]
Sontag S. (1996)
[29]
Strohl M. (2024)
Metrics
0
Citations
29
References
Details
- Published
- Mar 29, 2026
- License
- View
Authors
Cite This Article
Nat Hansen, Zed Adams (2026). The Very Idea of Seriousness. European Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.70082
Related
You May Also Like
Kant on the Laws of Nature: Laws, Necessitation, and the Limitation of Our Knowledge
James Kreines · 2009
23 citations