journal article Aug 06, 2019

VOTING AND SOCIAL PRESSURE UNDER IMPERFECT INFORMATION

International Economic Review Vol. 60 No. 4 pp. 1705-1735 · JSTOR
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/iere.12401
Abstract
AbstractWe develop a model in which costly voting in a large, two‐party election is a sequentially rational choice of strategic, self‐interested players who can reward fellow voters by forming stronger ties in a network formation coordination game. The predictions match a variety of stylized facts, including explaining why an individual's voting behavior may depend on what she knows about her friends' actions. Players have imperfect information about others' voting behavior, and we find that some degree of privacy may be necessary for voting in equilibrium, enabling hypocritical but useful social pressure. Our framework applies to any costly prosocial behavior.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
41
[3]
Ali S. N. andR.Bénabou “Image versus Information: Changing Societal Norms and Optimal Privacy ” NBER Working Paper 22203 2016. 10.3386/w22203
[8]
Costly Voting

Tilman Börgers

American Economic Review 10.1257/000282804322970706
[10]
Chandrasekhar A. G. H.Larreguy andJ. P.Xandri “Testing Models of Social Learning on Networks: Evidence from a Lab Experiment in the Field ” NBER Working Paper 21468 2015. 10.3386/w21468
[11]
Managing social norms for persuasive impact

Robert B. Cialdini, Linda J. Demaine, Brad J. Sagarin et al.

Social Influence 10.1080/15534510500181459
[12]
A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places.

Robert B. Cialdini, Raymond R. Reno, Carl A. Kallgren

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
[14]
An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy

Anthony Downs

Journal of Political Economy 10.1086/257897
[24]
Haberkorn J. “Just 4 Anti‐ACA House Dems Left ”Politico 2014.
[27]
Jackson M. O. (2014)
[29]
Kets W. andA.Sandroni “A Belief‐Based Theory of Homophily ” SSRN Working Paper 2871514 2015. 10.2139/ssrn.2871514
[32]
Levine D. K andA.Mattozzi “Voter Turnout with Peer Punishment ” working paper 2017.
[39]
The Pew Research Center For The People & The Press “Regular Voters Intermittent Voters and Those Who Don't: Who Votes Who Doesn't and Why ” technical report October2006.
[41]
Uhlaner C. J. (2019)
Metrics
1
Citations
41
References
Details
Published
Aug 06, 2019
Vol/Issue
60(4)
Pages
1705-1735
License
View
Cite This Article
Alexander T. Clark, Nicholas H. Tenev (2019). VOTING AND SOCIAL PRESSURE UNDER IMPERFECT INFORMATION. International Economic Review, 60(4), 1705-1735. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12401
Related

You May Also Like

Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets

Ronald Oaxaca · 1973

5,528 citations

Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error

Wim Meeusen, Julien van Den Broeck · 1977

3,774 citations

The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information

Eugene F. Fama, Lawrence Fisher · 1969

2,895 citations

Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis

Marilyn Manser, Murray Brown · 1980

1,070 citations

Nash-Bargained Household Decisions: Toward a Generalization of the Theory of Demand

Marjorie B. McElroy, Mary Jean Horney · 1981

1,042 citations