journal article Open Access Jun 17, 2022

Refugee protection in the region: A survey and evaluation of current trends

International Migration Vol. 61 No. 3 pp. 196-209 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/imig.13031
Abstract
Abstract
Protection in the region has rapidly become a favoured durable solution to refugee situations and the hallmark of all current policies. These initiatives reflect changes in humanitarian approaches that have taken place over the past decades as the focus has shifted towards the resilience of crisis‐affected communities and the need to enable their self‐reliance. Despite the strong logic that this change will bring about more dignified solutions, the approach is easily instrumentalized. This instrumentalization is particularly evident where resilience humanitarianism meets security‐migration politics. This paper focuses on the efforts of the European Union and a number of its member states to advance so‐called protection in the region. The paper reviews the characteristics of these policies, highlights a number of risks and defines some known and lesser known implications of this approach.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
69
[1]
Ansems de Vries L.(2021)UKoffshore asylum plan is just another way of imposing forced movement on vulnerable people The Conversation. 7 July 2021.
[2]
Ban K.‐M.(2016)One humanity: shared responsibility report of the secretary‐general for the world humanitarian summit UN General Assembly 2 February.
[3]
Betts A. (2017)
[4]
Bovenkerk F.(1981)Why returnees generally do not turn out to be “agents of change”: the case of Suriname Nieuwe West‐Indische Gids / New West Indian Guide 55th Year:154–73. 10.1163/22134360-90002123
[7]
Clemens M.A. (2017)
[8]
Collett E. (2017)
[9]
Haas H. (2006)
[10]
A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework

Hein de Haas

Comparative Migration Studies 10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4
[11]
Haas H. (2020)
[12]
deHaas H.&VezzoliS.(2010)Time to temper the faith: comparing the migration and development experiences of Mexico and Morocco Migration Information Source 29.
[15]
ECRE (2017)
[16]
EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa. (2020)Regional development and protection program in Ethiopia EU. Available from:https://ec.europa.eu/trustfundforafrica/region/horn‐africa/ethiopia/regional‐development‐and‐protection‐programme‐ethiopia_en[Accessed Dec 2020]
[17]
Euronews AP and DPA. (2021)Dutch protesters burn tyres outside military base housing afghan refugees Euronews.
[18]
European Commission (2016)
[19]
European Commission (2020)
[20]
Evans J.(2020). 'Everything you need to know about Boris Johnson's offshore migrant detention plans' the week 1 oct 2020.
[21]
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2021a)A country facing big challenges. Available from:https://www.bmz.de/en/countries/ethiopia[Accessed Jan 2021. ]
[22]
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (2021)
[23]
Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2021c)(Re‐)integrating refugees internally displaced persons and returnees. Available from:https://www.bmz.de/en/development‐policy/displaced‐people/reintegrating‐refugees‐returnees‐97932.
[26]
Giraudon V.(2018)How far can Europe push back its borders? The case of France in Niger The Conversation.
[27]
Government of the Netherlands.2021.Refugees and migration. Available from:https://www.government.nl/topics/development‐cooperation/the‐development‐policy‐of‐the‐netherlands/refugees‐and‐migrationAccessed January
[28]
Grundler M.&Guild E..2022.The UK‐Rwanda deal and its incompatibility with international law.In:EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy edited by Odysseus Network.
[30]
Huang C. (2019)
[31]
IASC. (2021)The Grand Bargain. Available from:https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/grand‐bargain
[33]
ILO (2020)
[35]
Kaag S.A.M. (2021)
[36]
Kroet C. (2017)
[39]
Lewis P. Pegg D. Walker P.&Stewart H.(2020)Revealed: no 10 explores sending asylum seekers to Moldova Morocco and Papua New Guinea.The Guardian 30 Sept 2020 .
[41]
Müller Funk L.. (2019)Adapting to staying or imagining futures elsewhere: Migration decision‐making of Syrian refugees in Turkey.
[42]
NL Times. (2016)Asylum reception cost The Netherlands €800 million last year.NL Times.
[44]
Oltermann P.&Kassam A.. (2021)Spain offers itself as hub for afghans who collaborated with EU.The Guardian 20 Aug 2021.
[45]
Ruist J.. (2016)Fiscal cost of refugees in Europe.VOXeu CEPR.
[47]
Sieradzka M.(2021)Afghan migrants trapped at the border between Poland and Belarus.DeutscheWelle.
[48]
Spark. (2019)Dutch private sector makes commitments to refugees. [Accessed Jan2021].
[49]
Tan N.F.&Vedsted‐Hansen J.. (2021)Denmark's legislation on extraterritorial asylum in light of Internationa and EU law. InMigration & Asylum Law and Policy in Europe edited by Odysseus Network.
[50]
Tarp F. "Aid and development" Swedish Economic Policy Review (2006)

Showing 50 of 69 references

Metrics
5
Citations
69
References
Details
Published
Jun 17, 2022
Vol/Issue
61(3)
Pages
196-209
License
View
Funding
H2020 European Research Council
Cite This Article
Simona Vezzoli, Dorothea Hilhorst, Lhamo Meyer, et al. (2022). Refugee protection in the region: A survey and evaluation of current trends. International Migration, 61(3), 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13031