journal article Jun 13, 2022

Interventions improving well‐being of adult cancer patients’ caregivers: A systematic review

Journal of Advanced Nursing Vol. 78 No. 9 pp. 2747-2764 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/jan.15320
Abstract
Abstract

Aim
The aim of this study was to determine what kind of psychosocial interventions aimed at improving the well‐being of adult cancer patient caregivers were developed, and to describe the methodological characteristics and clinical effectiveness of the interventions which could be included in the nursing care plans.


Design
Systematic review


Data sources
A systematic search of three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) was conducted to identify peer‐reviewed papers published between years 2004–2019.


Review Methods
The review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for systematic reviews. Data were extracted and appraised by three reviewers using standardized checklists. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse the data.


Results
A total of 37 studies underwent analysis. Most of the studies described psychoeducational interventions, designed for patient‐caregiver dyads, delivered face‐to‐face. There was a great variety in caregiver outcomes and measurement tools used. Even though most studies used a randomized controlled design and standardized intervention protocols, many reported problems with recruitment and attrition. Most studies reported that the intervention improved caregiver outcomes, yet the majority of them failed to report effect sizes.


Conclusion
There are currently a plethora of successful interventions available for cancer patient caregivers which can be included to the nursing care plan. Psychoeducational online interventions which include a social support component may have the best potential in supporting caregivers. It is important to address specific caregiver needs at different cancer stages rather than general needs of caregivers in future interventions.


Impact
This review suggests that despite a large number of different interventions which can be included in the nursing care plan to improve the support offered to caregivers, some issues should be addressed while designing an intervention study. The emphasis should be placed on reporting effect sizes, focusing on specific caregiver needs and improving recruitment, retention strategies and sustainability of caregiver interventions.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
75
[1]
When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect size estimators and follow-up bias

Casper Albers, Daniël Lakens

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.004
[3]
Summarizing systematic reviews

Edoardo Aromataris, Ritin Fernandez, Christina M. Godfrey et al.

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000055
[11]
Bowen M. (1978)
[17]
Cohen J. (1988)
[33]
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

J. P. T. Higgins, D. G. Altman, P. C. Gotzsche et al.

BMJ 10.1136/bmj.d5928
[35]
International Agency for Research on Cancer(2022 January 8)Cancer Today.https://gco.iarc.fr
[36]
Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017a).Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trial.https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2019‐05/JBI_RCTs_Appraisal_tool2017_0.pdf.
[37]
Joanna Briggs Institute(2017b)Checklist for quasi‐experimental (non‐randomized experimental studies).https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2019‐05/JBI_Quasi‐Experimental_Appraisal_Tool2017_0.pdf
[39]
Kaakinen J. R. (2015)

Showing 50 of 75 references

Metrics
14
Citations
75
References
Details
Published
Jun 13, 2022
Vol/Issue
78(9)
Pages
2747-2764
License
View
Funding
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Award: 645634
Cite This Article
Natalia Sak‐Dankosky, Paula Sherwood, Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, et al. (2022). Interventions improving well‐being of adult cancer patients’ caregivers: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(9), 2747-2764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15320
Related

You May Also Like

The qualitative content analysis process

Satu Elo, Helvi Kyngäs · 2008

15,913 citations

The integrative review: updated methodology

Robin Whittemore, Kathleen Knafl · 2005

6,220 citations

Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique

Felicity Hasson, Sinead Keeney · 2000

4,022 citations

The Delphi technique: myths and realities

Catherine Powell · 2003

1,739 citations