journal article Aug 24, 2021

Understanding embodied immersion in technology‐enabled embodied learning environments

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/jcal.12594
Abstract
Abstract

Objective
The aim of this current paper is to investigate the salient embodiment features in the empirical studies on technology‐enabled embodied learning environments (TEELEs), and to contribute a comprehensive conceptual framework to direct the understanding and the designing of TEELEs – to embody and how to embody.


Method
In this thematic paper, we carefully selected and reviewed 28 empirical studies (peer‐reviewed journal articles published in the recent decade between 2010 and 2020) on TEELEs, and analyzed their salient features concerning embodiment.


Results and Implications

Synthesizing the characteristics distilled from the selected studies, we propose the conceptual framework of
embodied immersion
, which consists of three major dimensions, namely, physical, sensory, and cognitive immersions. Eight factors – means of embodiment, amount of motoric movements, point of view, media effects, haptic effects, operational congruency, learning congruency, and personalization – contribute to these three dimensions, and are carefully articulated, discussed, and explicated. The discussions around the embodied immersion framework are rooted in the concepts of presence, immersion, and agency. We regard our framework as a trinity borrowing the ingredients from each of those three that will guide through the understanding and the designing of TEELEs.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
104
[2]
Alexander B. (2019)
[3]
Alibali M. W. (2007)
[6]
Baud‐Bovy G. &Balzarotti N.(2017).Using force‐feedback devices in educational settings: a short review. InProceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI international workshop on multimodal interaction for education(pp. 14‐21). ACM. 10.1145/3139513.3139518
[10]
Brown E.&Cairns P.(2004).A grounded investigation of game immersion. InProceedings of CHI ‘04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems(pp. 1297–1300). ACM. 10.1145/985921.986048
[15]
Learning symbols from permanent and transient visual presentations: Don't overplay the hand

Juan C. Castro-Alonso, Paul Ayres, Mona Wong et al.

Computers & Education 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.011
[23]
Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning

Chris Dede

Science 10.1126/science.1167311
[24]
Denisova A. &Cairns P.(2015).First person vs. third person perspective in digital games: do player preferences affect immersion? InProceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems(pp. 145‐148). ACM. 10.1145/2702123.2702256
[31]
Glaser B. G. (1967)
[35]
Hart C. (1999)
[38]
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E. Shannon

Qualitative Health Research 10.1177/1049732305276687
[39]
Hsieh T. C. "A Fuzzy logic‐based personalized learning system for supporting adaptive English learning" Educational Technology & Society (2012)
[44]
Jackson H. (2016)
[47]
Johnson‐Glenberg M. C. "Embodied science and mixed reality: How gesture and motion capture affect physics education" Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2017)
[50]
Johnson‐Glenberg M. C. (2022)

Showing 50 of 104 references

Cited By
41
Metrics
41
Citations
104
References
Details
Published
Aug 24, 2021
Vol/Issue
38(1)
Pages
103-119
License
View
Cite This Article
Xinhao Xu, Jina Kang, Lili Yan (2021). Understanding embodied immersion in technology‐enabled embodied learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12594