BishtRef
Articles Journals Publishers Authors Subjects Most Cited New Papers Year Stats Open Access
journal article Apr 05, 2022

Joint Institutional Frameworks in EU Bilateral Agreements: Joint Bodies, Rules and Principles, and Special Procedures

Andriy Tyushka ORCID David Phinnemore ORCID Wolfgang WEISS
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies Vol. 60 No. 4 pp. 1124-1143 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/jcms.13333
Abstract
AbstractThis introductory article makes the case for studying joint institutional frameworks (JIFs) in EU bilateral agreements and provides an overview of the remaining contributions to the symposium. In doing so, it addresses contemporary policy developments and theoretical debates in political science and international institutional law. It considers the rationale, design, performance as well as legitimacy of JIFs both in general and, in particular, in the EU's contractual bilateral relations. By mapping out the variety of JIFs in distinct geographical and regulatory contexts, the article develops an overarching argument about the ‘transversal’ nature of such structural frameworks, focusing on the most prevalent structural principles and rules, joint bodies and special procedures, including those not covered in detail in the other contributions to this symposium.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
99
[9]
Bradley C.A. "The Concept of International Delegation" Law & Contemporary Problems (2008)
[12]
Cremona M. (2018)
[15]
Dashwood A. "The Withdrawal Agreement: Common Provisions, Governance and Dispute Settlement" European Law Review (2020)
[18]
Decision No 1/80of the EC‐Turkey Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association (96/142/EC)(n.d.) not published in the Official Journal.
[19]
Decision No 1/95 of the EC‐Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Customs Union. OJ L 35 13.2.1996 pp. 1–46.
[21]
Domachowska A. "Institutionalization of Strategic Partnerships: A Comparative Analysis of Established European Union Partnerships with the United States, Japan and Canada" Athenaeum: Polish Political Sciences Studies (2018) 10.15804/athena.2018.60.12
[22]
Dragneva R. (2018)
[23]
Dür A. andGastinger M.(2019) ‘Joint Committees in the EU's International Agreements: A Principal‐Agent Analysis’. Paper presented at the 2019 Biennial EUSA Conference 9–11 May 2019 Denver CO. Available at:https://www.eustudies.org/conference/papers/16
[24]
Dür A.andGastinger M.(2021) ‘Joint Bodies in Preferential Trade Agreements: Why Are Some Stronger Than Others?’ Paper presented at The Political Economy of International Organization (PEIO) First Seminar Series (held online) 25 January 2021. Available at:https://www.peio.me/wp‐content/uploads/2021/papers/PEIOo21_paper_72.pdf
[27]
European Commission(2021)Trade Policy Review – An Open Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy COM(2021) 66 final Brussels 18 February. Available at:https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2021/february/tradoc_159438.pdf
[29]
Gammage C. "A Critique of the Extraterritorial Obligations of the EU in Relation to Human Rights Clauses and Social Norms in EU Free Trade Agreements" Europe and the World: A Law Review (2018)
[31]
Germany v Council of the European Union(2014)CJEU C‐399/12 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) (ECLI:EU:C:2014:2258) 7 October 2014.
[32]
Germany v Council of the European Union(2017)CJEU Case C‐600/14 Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar (ECLI:EU:C:2017:296) 24 April 2017.
[33]
Greece v Commission of the European Communities(1989)CJEU Case 30/88 Judgment of the Court (ECLI:EU:C:1989:422) 14 November 1989.
[35]
Hahn M. (2020)
[36]
Harrison J. "Governing Labour Standards through Free Trade Agreements: Limits of the European Union's Trade and Sustainable Development Chapters" JCMS (2019)
[37]
Hillion C. (2018)
[43]
Kerremans B. (2019)
[46]
Lavranos N. (2004)
[47]
Leruth B. "‘Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in the EU after Brexit: Risks versus Opportunities" JCMS (2019)
[50]
Lippert B. "Die EU und ihre Nachbarschaftsbeziehungen: etablierte Assoziierungsmodelle und neue Grundformen" Integration (2019)

Showing 50 of 99 references

Metrics
6
Citations
99
References
Details
Published
Apr 05, 2022
Vol/Issue
60(4)
Pages
1124-1143
License
View
Authors
A
Andriy Tyushka

European Neighbourhood Policy Chair College of Europe in Natolin Warsaw

D
David Phinnemore

School of History, Anthropology, Philosophy and Politics Queen's University Belfast Belfast

W
Wolfgang WEISS

Chair of Public Law, European and Public International Law German University of Administrative Sciences Speyer Speyer

Cite This Article
Andriy Tyushka, David Phinnemore, Wolfgang WEISS (2022). Joint Institutional Frameworks in EU Bilateral Agreements: Joint Bodies, Rules and Principles, and Special Procedures. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(4), 1124-1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13333
Related

You May Also Like

Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?

Ian Manners · 2002

1,857 citations

Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik

ANDREAS FOLLESDAL, Simon Hix · 2006

762 citations

The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post‐Maastricht Era

Christopher J. Bickerton, Dermot Hodson · 2014

401 citations

Alice in Euroland

Willem H. Buiter · 1999

172 citations

The Case for Demoicracy in the European Union*

Francis Cheneval, Frank Schimmelfennig · 2012

134 citations