Abstract
Abstract

Background
The differential diagnosis of early nail unit melanoma can be challenging.


Objectives
This retrospective cross‐sectional study aimed to characterize the clinical and dermoscopic changes in a series of cases of longitudinal melanonychia that underwent clinical and dermoscopic sequential digital monitoring.


Methods
All patients were adults presenting with a single acquired pigmented nail band and were monitored over time. Histologic diagnosis served as the gold standard for cases where excision was performed. For non‐excised cases, inclusion in the study required a minimum of 1 year of documented clinical and dermoscopic stability. Clinical and dermoscopic features were assessed at baseline and during the final follow‐up visit.


Results

After a median follow‐up of 17 months, 27 out of 62 lesions were excised. Among these, six cases (9.7%) were diagnosed as in situ melanomas, nine (14.5%) as nevi and 12 (19.4%) as lentigo or melanocytic hyperplasia. At baseline clinical evaluation, most of the bands, both benign and malignant, occupied less than one‐third of the nail plate (62.5% and 50%, respectively). Comparing dermoscopic features between baseline and follow‐up, granular pigmentation emerged in 33.3% of malignant nail bands but only in 3.6% of benign bands (
p
 = 0.04). An increase in the number of colours was observed in 50% of in situ melanomas, compared with 8.9% of benign lesions (
p
 = 0.02). Additionally, 83.3% of melanomas showed an increased intensity of pigmentation, a feature seen in only 14.3% of benign bands (
p
 = 0.001). Limitations include the relatively small number of melanoma cases (
n
 = 6), all cases were from pigment lesion clinics in Europe and involved only Caucasian patients. Lastly, only pigmented lesions were included, so no conclusions can be drawn regarding amelanotic subungual melanoma.



Conclusions
In conclusion, digital dermoscopy follow‐up of longitudinal melanonychia is a valuable management strategy in uncertain cases. The emergence of new colours, granular pigmentation or increased intensity of pigmentation during follow‐up should prompt a biopsy to rule out malignancy.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
14
[1]
Haneke E "Longitudinal melanonychia" Dermatol Surg (2001) 10.1097/00042728-200106000-00014
[2]
Tosti A "Dealing with melanonychia" Semin Cutan Med Surg (2009) 10.1016/j.sder.2008.12.004
[3]
Mole RJ (2024)
[4]
Duhard E "Prevalence of longitudinal melanonychia in the white population" Ann Dermatol Venereol (1995)
[6]
Saida T "Heterogeneity of the site of origin of malignant melanoma in ungual areas: “subungual” malignant melanoma may be a misnomer" Br J Dermatol (1992)
[7]
Piraccini BM "Tips for diagnosis and treatment of nail pigmentation with practical algorithm" Dermatol Clin (2015) 10.1016/j.det.2014.12.002
[8]
Koga H "Key point in dermoscopic differentiation between early nail apparatus melanoma and benign longitudinal melanonychia" J Dermatol (2011) 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.01175.x
[11]
Thomas L "Dermoscopy provides useful information for the management of melanonychia striata" Dermatol Ther (2007) 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2007.00106.x
[12]
Tosti A "Dermoscopy allows better management of nail pigmentation" Arch Dermatol (2002) 10.1001/archderm.138.10.1369
Metrics
8
Citations
14
References
Details
Published
Jun 30, 2025
Vol/Issue
39(11)
Pages
1955-1960
License
View
Authors
Cite This Article
Elvira Moscarella, Gabriella Brancaccio, Zoe Apalla, et al. (2025). Digital dermoscopy follow‐up for acquired longitudinal melanonychia. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 39(11), 1955-1960. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20822