journal article Sep 04, 2016

Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6‐minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/jep.12629
Abstract
AbstractRationale, aims, and objectivesThe 6‐minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used as a test of functional exercise capacity. Several studies have reported the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the 6MWT; however, the findings of the studies have not been examined in the context of one another. In this review, we aimed to summarize available information on the MCID for the 6MWT performed by patients with pathology.MethodsRelevant literature was identified by searches of 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health), examination of article reference lists, and consultation with an expert. Inclusion necessitated that articles (1) be original, full length, and peer reviewed, (2) report an MCID for the 6MWT, and (3) focus on adults with medical issues. Articles were excluded if the MCID was determined by a procedure other than receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Articles were abstracted for information on participants, interventions, 6MWT distance, and the determination of MCID. Quality was assessed using a hybrid 9‐item (0‐ to 18‐point) instrument.ResultsSix articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The populations studied included people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, coronary artery disease, diffuse parenchymal lung disease, and non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and adults with fear of falling. Mean baseline 6MWT distances ranged from 295 to 551 m. The MCIDs for which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was at least 0.70 ranged from 14.0 to 30.5 m.ConclusionsBased on our findings, a change of 14.0 to 30.5 m may be clinically important across multiple patient groups.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
17
[1]
ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test
American Review of Respiratory Disease 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102
[5]
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

Caroline B. Terwee, Sandra D.M. Bot, Michael R. de Boer et al.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
[10]
The minimal clinically important difference of six-minute walk in Asian older adults

Boon Chong Kwok, Yong Hao Pua, Kaysar Mamun et al.

BMC Geriatrics 10.1186/1471-2318-13-23
[17]
Meaningful Change and Responsiveness in Common Physical Performance Measures in Older Adults

Subashan Perera, Samir H. Mody, Richard C. Woodman et al.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x
Metrics
595
Citations
17
References
Details
Published
Sep 04, 2016
Vol/Issue
23(2)
Pages
377-381
License
View
Cite This Article
Richard W. Bohannon, Rebecca Crouch (2016). Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6‐minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23(2), 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12629