journal article Nov 16, 2021

The Rise and Fall of Structural Contingency Theory: A Theory’s ‘autopsy’

Journal of Management Studies Vol. 59 No. 3 pp. 782-818 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/joms.12772
Abstract
AbstractHalf a century after emerging as a leading theory in the then nascent field of organization theory, structural contingency theory seems to have disappeared from the scholarly stage. Have theoretical and methodological deficiencies predestined the theory to oblivion? Was it the lack of empirical support or practical application? Was the theory doomed by its failure to adapt to new conditions or was it rendered obsolete by the emergence of new theories with superior explanatory power? Or was the decline the result of the dispersion of its research community and the rise of strategy at the expense of organization theory? These questions and more are addressed in this paper as part of a ‘theoretical autopsy’ seeking explanations for the theory’s decline or demise. Repercussions for current and emerging organization and management theories are delineated.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
126
[3]
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage

Jay Barney

Journal of Management 10.1177/014920639101700108
[8]
Bennett J. K. "The building blocks of the learning organization" Training (1994)
[11]
Burns T. (1961)
[12]
Burrell G. (1979)
[16]
Claver‐Cortés E. "Characteristics of organizational structure relating to hybrid competitive strategy: Implications for performance" Dirección de la Empresa (2012)
[18]
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation

Wesley M. Cohen, Daniel A. Levinthal

Administrative Science Quarterly 10.2307/2393553
[19]
Cole J. R. "Social stratification in science" Science and Society (1974)
[22]
Cozzens S. E. "Taking the measure of science: A review of citation theories" International Society for the Sociology of Knowledge (1981)
[23]
Crane D. (1972)
[26]
Daft R. (1986)
[32]
Donaldson L. (1995)
[33]
Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory

Robert Drazin, Andrew H. van de Ven

Administrative Science Quarterly 10.2307/2392695
[35]
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review

Kathleen M. Eisenhardt

The Academy of Management Review 10.2307/258191
[37]
Manifesto for a Relational Sociology

Mustafa Emirbayer

American Journal of Sociology 10.1086/231209
[42]
Gerwin D. "Relationships between structure and technology at the organizational and job levels" Journal of Management (1979)
[44]
THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY.

C. B. Gibson, J. Birkinshaw

Academy of Management Journal 10.2307/20159573
[45]
Goffman W. (1980)
[47]
Grant R. M. (1991)
[48]
Grant R. M. (1995)
[49]
Grant R. M. (2010)

Showing 50 of 126 references

Metrics
41
Citations
126
References
Details
Published
Nov 16, 2021
Vol/Issue
59(3)
Pages
782-818
License
View
Cite This Article
Oded Shenkar, Shmuel Ellis (2021). The Rise and Fall of Structural Contingency Theory: A Theory’s ‘autopsy’. Journal of Management Studies, 59(3), 782-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12772