journal article Oct 17, 2014

Compassion organizing: Employees' satisfaction with corporate philanthropic disaster response and reduced job strain

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/joop.12088
Abstract
The literature on corporate social responsibility and corporate philanthropy generally focuses on how employers come to the aid of those
outside
the organization who have been affected by disasters. Less is known about an organization's corporate philanthropic disaster response (
CPDR
) directed towards
their
employees. We argue, based on conservation of resources (
H
obfoll, 1989,

A
m

.

P
sychol

., 44, 513) and compassion organizing (
D
utton
et al
., 2006,

A
dmin

.

S
ci

.

Q
uart

., 51, 59) literatures, that employees perceive employers who provide aid to them following a natural disaster as supportive. This aid from
CPDR
provides support to employees and helps to restore the loss of valued resources. Accordingly, we predict that satisfaction with
CPDR
reduces employee psychological and physiological strain via its positive effects on perceived organizational support. We find support for our predictions using a sample of 695
H
urricane
K
atrina survivors. Finally, we discussed theoretical contributions and implications of this research.



Practitioner points



Organizations are encouraged to fulfil their social responsibilities. Our research shows that organizations should be socially responsible not only to the general public, but also to their own employees. Responding compassionately by providing aid to an organization's own employees is an important element in carrying out their social responsibilities. In the aftermath of a severe natural disaster, employees may need to rely on their organizations to provide timely assistance. Such assistance could help them mitigate their strain, both psychologically and physiologically, aroused from the disaster they experienced.


Organizations' compassion organizing in the form of philanthropic disaster response to their employees may be beneficial to the organization. First, it shows the organization's intention to fulfil their social responsibility and to be a good and ethical citizen. Second, by providing assistance to their employees to deal with the challenge of restoring normal lives, organizations can help employees to continue working in a productive and effective way.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
95
[1]
Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations

Ruth V. Aguilera, Deborah E. Rupp, Cynthia A. Williams et al.

The Academy of Management Review 10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
[3]
Bower H. R. (1953)
[11]
Dolfman M. L. Wasser S. F. &Bergman B.(2007).The effects of Hurricane Katrina on the New Orleans economy. Retrieved fromhttp://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2007/06/art1full.pdf
[20]
Fishbein M. (1975)
[31]
Hayes A. F. (2013)
[38]
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

Li‐tze Hu, Peter M. Bentler

Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary... 10.1080/10705519909540118
[45]
Kelley H. H. (1967)
[47]
Lazarus R. S. (1984)
[49]
Lilius J. M. (2011)

Showing 50 of 95 references