Organizational models for advancing technological innovations: A configurational approach

Gina Colarelli O'Connor

doi:10.1111/jpim.12775

journal article Dec 30, 2024

Organizational models for advancing technological innovations: A configurational approach

Gina Colarelli O'Connor

Journal of Product Innovation Management Vol. 42 No. 5 pp. 897-920 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/jpim.12775

Abstract

AbstractNovel technologies are emerging and evolving at such a rapid pace that it is difficult for companies and society to absorb them. Large mature organizations can be displaced if they fail to learn about, develop, and adopt new technologies, yet they struggle to do so. What is the best approach? Clearly there is no single best answer. This paper examines organizational models that companies have experimented with for leveraging technological discoveries and inventions to create strategic innovations that fuel new growth opportunities. I adopt Kanter's concept of newstreams as the guiding lens, because it addresses the challenges that mature firms face in their attempts to create new platforms of growth that emerging technologies enable, while maintaining the health of the mainstream core business. This notion demands an extension of ambidexterity theory beyond the exploration/exploitation dichotomy, recognizing that creating new streams of growth that ultimately become part of the mainstream organization requires elements of exploitation to enhance reliability and predictability that the mainstream requires. Five organizational approaches for SI that have been observed in practice are described and considered in light of three elements that, together, can be thought of as comprising a technological innovation strategy: (a) type of ambidextrous approach the firm adopts, (b) type of technology (general vs. special purpose), and (c) targeted market (internal vs. external). By combining theory and observation, configurations of ambidexterity type, technology type, and target market are proposed, as well as expected outcomes for each. I offer these as a research agenda whose outcome can provide important guidance to organizational leaders who are attempting to build capabilities for technological innovation that will secure their organizations' future health.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

115

[1]

10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6

[2]

10.1186/s40604-018-0053-9

[3]

Allen Thomas J. (1984)

[4]

Baeza Ramon DavidAllred MichaelBrigl SandraDeutschländer CharlesGildehaus DeborahLovich MatthiasSchmidt ChrisStutzman andLaurenTaylor.2021.“The CEO Innovation Agenda.” Boston Consulting Group.https://www.bcg.com/publications/2021/understanding-ceo-innovation

[5]

Bartlett Christopher A. Brian J.Hall andNicoleBennett.2008 June.“GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project.” Harvard Business School Case 907‐048. Harvard Business School.https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=34629

[6]

Binns Andrew "The Missing Discipline behind Failure to Scale" MIT Sloan Management Review (2023)

[7]

Binns Andrew (2022)

[8]

Birkinshaw Julian andCristinaGibson.2004.“Building Ambidexterity into an Organization.”MIT Sloan Mgmt Review Summer.https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/building‐ambidexterity‐into‐an‐organization/

[9]

10.1016/j.orgdyn.2005.06.009

[10]

10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.36

[11]

Blank Steve.2019 October 7.“Why Companies Do “Innovation Theater” Instead of Actual Innovation?”Harvard Business Review Online.https://hbr.org/2019/10/why-companies-do-innovation-theater-instead-of-actual-innovation

[12]

Bloomberg Originals.2003 March 28.“How Samsung Became World's No. 1 Smartphone Maker”.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-JEYGqYTjk

[13]

Boston Consulting Group.2023 May.“Reaching New Heights in Uncertain Times.”Most Innovative Companies2023 Report.https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/advantages‐through‐innovation‐in‐uncertain‐times

[14]

10.1016/s0169-7218(10)02002-2

[15]

The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies

Erik Brynjolfsson, Daniel Rock, Chad Syverson

American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 10.1257/mac.20180386

[16]

Burgelman Robert A. (2020)

[17]

Burgelman Robert A. "Managing Internal Corporate Venturing Cycles" Sloan Management Review (2005)

[18]

Chakravarthy Bala (2003)

[19]

10.1108/02756660810858116

[20]

Chen Jeff Yu‐Jen andCarenScheepers.2019.“FNB Codefest: Fostering Corporate Innovation Through In‐House Hackathons.” Ivey Case # W19151. Harvard Business Case Collection

[21]

Chesbrough Henry W. (2003)

[22]

10.1109/tem.2018.2845343

[23]

Production and Operations Management 1 Exploring the Limits of the Technology S‐Curve. Part I: Component Technologies

[24]

Christensen Clayton M. (1997)

[25]

10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015

[26]

10.3386/w24449

[27]

10.1093/oso/9780199299195.003.0003

[28]

10.1002/sej.1127

[29]

10.1093/icc/dtx049

[30]

Davila Antonio.2019.“Schneider Electric: Opening Up to External Innovation.” Harvard case 9‐119‐061. Harvard Business School

[31]

10.1016/j.emj.2020.07.008

[32]

Eagar Rick PhilWebster PetterKilefors andIngrid.Sandeberg.2019.“The Next Generation of Corporate Incubators.”A. D. Little PRISMIssue 2.https://www.adlittle.com/en/insights/prism/the-next-generation-of-corporate-incubators

[33]

Psychological Safety Comes of Age: Observed Themes in an Established Literature

Amy C. Edmondson, Derrick P. Bransby

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Org... 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217

[34]

Dynamic capabilities: what are they?

Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Jeffrey A. Martin

Strategic Management Journal 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::aid-smj133>3.0.co;2-e

[35]

10.1287/mnsc.30.6.682

[36]

Farri Elisa PaoloCervini andGabrieleRosani.2023 March 2.“The 8 Responsibilities of Chief Sustainability Officers.”Havard Business Review Online.https://hbr.org/2023/03/the-8-responsibilities-of-chief-sustainability-officers

[37]

10.1111/joms.12718

[38]

Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research

Peer C. Fiss

Academy of Management Journal 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120

[39]

10.1007/978-3-322-83742-4

[40]

10.1080/09585192.2015.1045007

[41]

10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x

[42]

Garvin David A. "Meeting the Challenge of Corporate Entrepreneurship" Harvard Business Review (2006)

[43]

THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY.

C. B. Gibson, J. Birkinshaw

Academy of Management Journal 10.2307/20159573

[44]

10.1515/9780804783323

[45]

The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation

Anil K. Gupta, Ken G. Smith, Christina E. Shalley

Academy of Management Journal 10.5465/amj.2006.22083026

[46]

10.1109/tem.2023.3265511

[47]

Hamel Gary.2010.“Innovation Democracy: W. L. Gore's Original Management Model.”Management Innovation eXchange September 29.https://www.managementexchange.com/story/innovation-democracy-wl-gores-original-management-model

[48]

10.1007/s00191-009-0165-5

[49]

10.1287/orsc.1040.0078

[50]

Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms

Rebecca M. Henderson, Kim B. Clark

Administrative Science Quarterly 10.2307/2393549

Showing 50 of 115 references

Metrics

3

Citations

115

References

Details

Published: Dec 30, 2024
Vol/Issue: 42(5)
Pages: 897-920
License: View

Authors

G

Gina Colarelli O'Connor

Entrepreneurship Division Babson College Wellesley Massachusetts USA

Cite This Article

Gina Colarelli O'Connor (2024). Organizational models for advancing technological innovations: A configurational approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 42(5), 897-920. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12775

Organizational models for advancing technological innovations: A configurational approach

You May Also Like