journal article Sep 29, 2020

Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/jtsb.12260
Abstract
ABSTRACTFor nearly four decades, a variety of social science disciplines have assumed that the zone of proximal development (ZPD) and the metaphor of scaffolding reflect more or less the same process. However, we will argue that any similarity is at best partial and at worst superficial. Equating the processes adds nothing to Vygotsky's general theory and in fact may weaken and dilute the robustness of the theory. To make the non‐equivalence case, the paper first presents an overview of Vygotsky's approach to psychology that includes an expansive discussion of the ZPD not only as the activity in which instruction leads development, but also as the key to his approach to experimental research. This is followed by a critical review of the relevant statements that have appeared in the literature on the nature of scaffolding, its presumed link to the ZPD and that brings to the fore the inadequacies of the metaphor itself that disqualify it as an equivalent process. While the ZPD can be understood to include the kind of interaction that is described in the scaffolding literature, it is a much broader and far more robust process than scaffolding, as is made apparent when the two processes are compared, which is the focus of the concluding section of the article. In the comparison we summarize the analyses presented, especially with regard to the implications and relevance of the metaphors underlying each concept.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
76
[2]
Applebee A. "Scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities" Language Arts (1983) 10.58680/la198326236
[6]
Toward an experimental ecology of human development.

Urie Bronfenbrenner

American Psychologist 10.1037/0003-066x.32.7.513
[9]
Bruner J. S. (2006)
[11]
Materializing ‘Competence’: Perspectives From International STEM Scholars

SURESH CANAGARAJAH

The Modern Language Journal 10.1111/modl.12464
[13]
Cazden C. (1979)
[14]
Cazden C. B. (1981)
[16]
Cole M. (1996)
[17]
Cole M. "The perils of translation: A first step in reconsidering Vygotsky's theory of development in relation to formal education. Mind, culture, and activity" An International Journal (2009)
[20]
Egan K. (2002)
[23]
John‐Steiner V. (1978)
[25]
Krashen S. D. (2000)
[31]
Levitin K. (1980)
[32]
Luria A. R. (1992)
[33]
Marx K. (1963)
[34]
Marx K. (1973)
[35]
Marx K. (1978)
[37]
Newman F. (1993)
[38]
Ollman B. (2003)
[41]
Piattelli‐Palmarini M. (1979)
[44]
Scribner S. (1985)
[49]

Showing 50 of 76 references

Cited By
81
Metrics
81
Citations
76
References
Details
Published
Sep 29, 2020
Vol/Issue
51(1)
Pages
25-48
License
View
Cite This Article
Jiao Xi, James P. Lantolf (2020). Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260