journal article Apr 13, 2020

The influence of lateral flows in an aquifer on the agricultural value of groundwater

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/nrm.12266
Abstract
AbstractValuation of water in an aquifer depends on reliable information about the hydrologic conditions of an aquifer. Regions of depression emerge in an aquifer because groundwater cannot seamlessly flow between shallow and deep aquifer locations, and our analysis shows that the degree of lateral flow influences the value of the water in the aquifer. The assumption that groundwater declines uniformly over a landscape, a bathtub aquifer, leads to an underestimate of the value of a unit of water in an aquifer but an overestimate of the wealth that the aquifer represents. For the alluvial aquifer in Arkansas, USA, the average accounting price of water in an aquifer is almost 40% higher if there is no lateral flow, but the groundwater wealth is 10% lower. The value of an aquifer with the limited lateral flow is less sensitive to changes in agricultural markets, the discount rate, or the natural recharge of the aquifer.Recommendations for Resource Managers
Average value of water in an aquifer with limited lateral flows is nearly 40% higher than the value of an aquifer with high lateral flows.
Groundwater wealth weights the accounting prices of water in the aquifer by the amount water underneath each site. As lateral flows decline, the wealth of the aquifer rises and then falls because the distribution of accounting prices change so most water is beneath sites with lower accounting prices.
The average value of water in an aquifer is less sensitive to changes in hydro‐economic model parameters such as the natural recharge or discount rate when the lateral flows are less.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
31
[1]
Arkansas Natural Resources Commission (ANRC). (2018). Arkansas Groundwater Protection and Management Report for 2017. Little Rock AR.
[6]
Clark B.R. Westerman D.A. &Fugitt D.T.(2013). Enhancements to the Mississippi embayment regional aquifer study (MERAS) groundwater‐flow model and simulations of sustainable water‐level scenarios. The U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5161 29p. 10.3133/sir20135161
[7]
Division of Agriculture University of Arkansas. (2018). 2018 Crop and Enterprise Budgets. Little Rock AR: AG‐1272. Retrieved fromhttps://www.uaex.edu/farm‐ranch/economics‐marketing/farm‐planning/budgets/Budget_Text_2018.pdf
[8]
Energy Information Administration (EIA) US Department of Energy. (2019). Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/
[10]
Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri (FAPRI)(2019).Baseline update for U.S. agricultural markets August 28 2019(FAPRI‐MU Report no. 03‐19). Columbia MO: Division of Applied Social Sciences in the College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources.
[11]
General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) Development Corporation. (2016). GAMS—A User's Guide. Washington D.C. Retrieved fromhttps://www.gams.com/help/index.jsp
[13]
Hartwick J. "Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources" American Economic Review (1977)
[14]
Hogan R. (2007)
[15]
Johnson D. M. "The 2009 cropland data layer" Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing (2010)
[16]
Konikow L.F.(2013). Groundwater depletion in the United States (1900−2008): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013−5079. 63p Retrieved fromhttp://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5079 10.3133/sir20135079
[22]
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) US Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2014). 2013 Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2012/Online_Resources/Farm_and_Ranch_Irrigation_Survey/
[23]
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Arkansas Field Office. (2017). Soybean irrigated and non‐irrigated. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Arkansas/Publications/County_Estimates/
[24]
National Research Council (1997)
[25]
Office of Management and Budget. (2003). Circular A‐4: Regulatory analysis. Executive Office of the President Washington DC.
[26]
Reed T.B.(2003).Recalibration of a groundwater flow model of the Mississippi river valley alluvial aquifer of northeastern Arkansas 1918–1998 with simulations of water levels caused by projected groundwater withdrawals through 2049. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 03‐4109 58p.
[29]
United Nations (2018)
[30]
Wang C. "The economics of commonly owned groundwater when user demand is perfectly inelastic" Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (2011)
Metrics
13
Citations
31
References
Details
Published
Apr 13, 2020
Vol/Issue
33(2)
License
View
Funding
U.S. Geological Survey
Cite This Article
Kent F. Kovacs, Alvaro Durand‐Morat (2020). The influence of lateral flows in an aquifer on the agricultural value of groundwater. Natural Resource Modeling, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12266
Related

You May Also Like

THE NET REPRODUCTIVE VALUE AND STABILITY IN MATRIX POPULATION MODELS

J.M. Cushing, Zhou Yicang · 1994

153 citations

ECONOMICS AND THE MODELING OF WATER RESOURCES AND POLICIES

JAMES F. BOOKER, Richard E. Howitt · 2011

134 citations

MARINE PROTECTED AREA PERFORMANCE IN A MODEL OF THE FISHERY

Ussif Rashid Sumaila · 2002

33 citations

A copula‐based index for drought analysis in arid and semi‐arid regions of Iran

Ommolbanin Bazrafshan, Hossein Zamani · 2019

31 citations