journal article Feb 14, 2024

A phylogenetic perspective on ecological specialisation reveals hummingbird and insect pollinators have generalist diets

Oikos Vol. 2024 No. 4 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/oik.10208
Abstract
Specialisation in food resource use is a crucial process that fosters species coexistence in plant–animal networks, contributing to the maintenance of biodiversity, ecological complexity, and community stability. Notably, although there is a vast literature on ecological specialisation in pollination systems, the evolutionary similarity among the plant species visited by particular pollinators has been largely ignored. Here, we apply a robust phylogenetic approach to analyse whether the evolutionary relatedness of plant species is a significant factor in mediating pollinator visits and how it relates to the morphology of interacting species. We quantified ecological and clade specialisation of hummingbird and insect species in three mutualistic networks from the Costa Rican highlands and associated these metrics with species traits. We found that hummingbirds were overall ecologically more specialised than insects (i.e. visited a less diverse set of plant species). However, when evaluating the phylogenetic relatedness among the visited plant species, all hummingbird species and most insects had overdispersed diets, which indicates they visited phylogenetically distant plant species in the community. Moreover, a great proportion of these clade generalists visited plant species with a great variation in corolla length, showing a lack of preference for this morphological trait. Altogether, our results demonstrate that by incorporating plant phylogeny to network analysis, pollinator species were generalists and that corolla length weakly influences plant–pollinator interactions in the three studied networks. A phylogenetic perspective should occupy a central role in the study of specialisation since it contributes to understanding the interplay between ecological and evolutionary processes in mutualistic networks. Future research should focus on evaluating whether the phylogenetic structure of animal diets mediates patterns of interactions in different types of mutualisms and environmental contexts, linking these patterns to other floral traits. This knowledge may be valuable for deepening our comprehension of the underlying mechanisms shaping ecological networks.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
77
[2]
Bartón K. Package ‘MuMIn'. Multimodel inference, ver. 1.40.0 (2017)
[6]

Nico Blüthgen, Florian Menzel, Nils Blüthgen

BMC Ecology 10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
[7]
Bullock S. H. "Relationship among body size, wing size and mass in bees from a tropical dry forest in México" J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. (1999)
[16]
Morphology predicts species' functional roles and their degree of specialization in plant–frugivore interactions

D. Matthias Dehling, Pedro Jordano, H. Martin Schaefer et al.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series... 10.1098/rspb.2015.2444
[17]
Dormann C. F. Package ‘bipartite': visualising bipartite networks and calculating some (ecological) indices, ver. 2.08 (2017)
[20]
Faegri K. The principles of pollination ecology (1979)
[25]
Herrera W. "El clima de los páramos de Costa Rica" Páramos de Costa Rica (2005)
[26]
Hothorn T. Package ‘multcomp' (2017)
[35]
Kappelle M. Páramos de Costa Rica (2005)
[36]
Laliberté E. Package “FD”. – Version 1.0‐12, measuring functional diversity (FD) from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology (2014)
[39]
Legendre P. Numerical ecology (2012)

Showing 50 of 77 references

Related

You May Also Like

Let the concept of trait be functional!

Cyrille Violle, Marie‐Laure Navas · 2007

4,020 citations

Connectivity Is a Vital Element of Landscape Structure

Philip D. Taylor, Lenore Fahrig · 1993

1,853 citations

Ecological Processes That Affect Populations in Complex Landscapes

John B. Dunning, Brent J. Danielson · 1992

1,489 citations