Abstract
ABSTRACT

Introduction
In the evolving treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), atrioventricular (AV) node ablation is being reconsidered as an early option for patients with inadequate AF control and limited cure potential. Although interest in physiological pacing is growing, concerns about the long‐term safety of permanent His bundle pacing (p‐HBP) persist. Our current study aims to evaluate the long‐term outcomes of patients who underwent AV node ablation and p‐HBP, focusing on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, readmissions, and pacing parameters.


Methods
This descriptive observational study involved patients with uncontrolled permanent atrial arrhythmias who were eligible for heart rate (HR) control (between January 2019 and July 2020) and underwent p‐HBP and AV node ablation, followed during a near 4‐year period.


Results

We conducted a long‐term follow‐up study with a median duration of 47 months on 32 patients who received p‐HBP followed by AV node ablation. The average age was 77 years, predominantly female (65.6%), with a high prevalence of hypertension (90.6%). The main indications for ablation were uncontrolled AF (59.4%) and atypical atrial flutter (37.5%). At baseline, the median LVEF was 60%. Notably, LVEF improved significantly from 45% to 50% in those with reduced baseline function (
p
 < 0.05). NYHA class improvements were also observed over time. The His thresholds remained similar during long‐term follow‐up, being 1.25 V at 0.4 ms (1.25–2.4 V at 0.4 ms) before AV node ablation and 1.30 V at 0.4 ms (0.75–2.25 V at 0.4 ms),
p
 = 0.89, at long‐term follow‐up. The impedances remained stable. No complications related to the pacemaker occurred. Number of medications per patient for HR control significantly decreased from 1.6 to 0.37 (
p
 < 0.05), while hospital admissions for tachyarrhythmias dropped markedly. There was one death during the follow‐up due to cancer, but conclusions regarding mortality are limited by the small sample size.



Conclusions
AV node ablation and p‐HBP significantly improve functional class and LVEF, with benefits maintained over time. Patients experience fewer emergency visits and reduced HR medication. Pacing parameters remained stable during long‐term follow‐up.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
25
[1]
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

Isabelle C Van Gelder, Michiel Rienstra, Karina V Bunting et al.

European Heart Journal 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176
[6]
Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation

Neal A. Chatterjee, Gaurav A. Upadhyay, KENNETH A. ELLENBOGEN et al.

Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 10.1161/circep.111.967810
[9]
Moriña Vázquez P. "Permanent Pacing of the Bundle of His After Radiofrequency Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Patients With Suprahisian Conduction Disturbances" Revista Espanola De Cardiologia (2001)
[18]
AV junction ablation and cardiac resynchronization for patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and narrow QRS: the APAF-CRT mortality trial

Michele Brignole, Francesco Pentimalli, Pietro Palmisano et al.

European Heart Journal 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab569
Metrics
1
Citations
25
References
Details
Published
Jun 19, 2025
Vol/Issue
48(7)
Pages
799-806
License
View
Cite This Article
María Teresa Moraleda‐Salas, Ane Erkoreka‐Gasituaga, Carlos Perea‐Alfaro, et al. (2025). Long‐Term Results of Atrioventricular Node Ablation After His Bundle Pacing in Uncontrolled Atrial Tachyarrhythmias. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 48(7), 799-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70000