journal article Aug 02, 2021

Target‐setting, political incentives, and the tricky trade‐off between economic development and environmental protection

Public Administration Vol. 100 No. 4 pp. 923-941 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/padm.12768
Abstract
AbstractDisentangling the relationship between economic development and environmental protection has attracted much attention from public administration scholars. While traditionally scholars approach the relationship from either a substitutive or a complementary perspective, we offer a nuanced perspective by examining how the target‐setting on economic growth shapes environmental performance. This article proposes an explanation for the impacts of gross domestic product growth targets on environmental performance based on a yardstick competition model, where the upper‐level governments use relative performance to create competition among lower‐level governments. We argue that a trade‐off exists between economic development and environmental performance; however, the substitutive relationship tends to transit to a complementary relationship when environmental performance is incorporated into the cadre evaluation system. Analyzing a panel dataset of economic targets and PM2.5 air pollution across Chinese cities from 2001 to 2010, we confirm the relationship between economic targets and environmental performance by highlighting local leaders' political incentives.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
53
[2]
Besley T. "Incumbent behavior: vote seeking, tax setting, and yardstick competition" The American Economic Review (1995)
[4]
Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses

Thomas Brambor, William Roberts Clark, Matt Golder

Political Analysis 10.1093/pan/mpi014
[9]
Relative performance evaluation and the turnover of provincial leaders in China

Ye Chen, Hongbin Li, Li-An Zhou

Economics Letters 10.1016/j.econlet.2005.05.003
[11]
Deschenes O. (2018)
[16]
China's Local Political Budget Cycles

Gang Guo

American Journal of Political Science 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00390.x
[18]
Measuring Economic Growth from Outer Space

J. Vernon Henderson, Adam Storeygard, David N Weil

American Economic Review 10.1257/aer.102.2.994
[20]
Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design

Bengt Holmstrom, Paul Milgrom

The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24
[26]
Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts

Edward P. Lazear, Sherwin Rosen

Journal of Political Economy 10.1086/261010
[28]
Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China

Hongbin Li, Li-An Zhou

Journal of Public Economics 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009
[29]
Target Setting in Tournaments: Theory and Evidence from China

Xing Li, Chong Liu, Xi Weng et al.

The Economic Journal 10.1093/ej/uez018
[36]
Portney K.E. (2003)
[38]
Schlanger Z.(2017 December 28)Legal levels of air pollution are killing the elderly. Available at:https://qz.com/1166010/air-pollution-even-at-levels-that-meet-national-standards-causes-premature-death/
[43]
Juking the Stats? Authoritarian Information Problems in China

Jeremy L. Wallace

British Journal of Political Science 10.1017/s0007123414000106
[44]
Wang A.L. "The search for sustainable legitimacy: environmental law and bureaucracy in China" Harvard Environmental Law Review (2013)
[47]
The Fundamental Institutions of China's Reforms and Development

Chenggang Xu

Journal of Economic Literature 10.1257/jel.49.4.1076
[49]
Strategic interaction in political competition: Evidence from spatial effects across Chinese cities

Jihai Yu, Li-An Zhou, Guozhong Zhu

Regional Science and Urban Economics 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.12.003

Showing 50 of 53 references

Metrics
120
Citations
53
References
Details
Published
Aug 02, 2021
Vol/Issue
100(4)
Pages
923-941
License
View
Cite This Article
Juan Du, Hongtao Yi (2021). Target‐setting, political incentives, and the tricky trade‐off between economic development and environmental protection. Public Administration, 100(4), 923-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12768