Cutback management strategies and citizen evaluation of government
Through a behavioral approach, citizen evaluations of government performance have been an area of study in public administration. Research has explored how different factors influence citizens’ perceptions of public organizations, such as public sector bias and reference points. Understudied in this literature is how citizens evaluate government based on their use of financial management strategies. The Pandemic and other economic challenges have forced governments to engage in cutback management strategies to balance the budget. How do citizens evaluate governments based on their cutback strategies? To answer this theoretical question, we employ a survey experiment design with over 1600 respondents from the U.S. to explore how four cutback management strategies can influence citizen evaluations of government. Our findings suggest that cutback management strategies do influence citizens’ evaluation of government in trust, satisfaction, performance, and fairness. Citizens are more favorable to infrastructure or materials and contractor cuts than increasing taxes or reducing personnel. Further analysis by respondent partisanship indicates Democrats are more accepting of tax increases. Republicans rate governments lower when they cut capital and infrastructure and rate governments higher when they decrease personnel expenditures.
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Sebastian Jilke, Asmus Leth Olsen et al.
Showing 50 of 84 references
- Published
- Jun 30, 2023
- Vol/Issue
- 102(2)
- Pages
- 715-732
- License
- View
You May Also Like
Fritz W. Scharpf · 1988
856 citations
THOMAS DIEFENBACH · 2009
558 citations
WOUTER VANDENABEELE · 2008
301 citations
Zeger Van Der Wal, GJALT DE GRAAF · 2008
297 citations
ALEX TURRINI, DANIELA CRISTOFOLI · 2009
287 citations