journal article May 15, 2017

Changing the paradigm for diagnostic MRI in pediatrics: Don't hold your breath

Pediatric Anesthesia Vol. 27 No. 9 pp. 880-884 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/pan.13165
Abstract
SummaryIncreasingly complex pediatric patients and improvements in technology warrant reevaluation of the risk associated with anesthesia for diagnostic imaging. Although magnetic resonance imaging is the imaging modality of choice for children given the potentially harmful effects of computerized tomography‐associated ionizing radiation, we dare to suggest that certain patients would benefit from the liberalization of our current standard. Incorporating the use of newer computerized tomography technology may improve safety for those that are already at higher risk for adverse events. Furthermore, magnetic resonance imaging is not risk‐free—what is often overlooked is the need for controlled ventilation and breath‐holding to minimize motion artifact. As physicians at the forefront of the development and sustainability of the perioperative surgical home, anesthesiologists must work to not only optimize patients preoperatively but should also act as gatekeepers for procedural safety.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
29
[5]
Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: adverse events and outcomes

S. Malviya, T. Voepel-Lewis, O.P. Eldevik et al.

British Journal of Anaesthesia 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013586
[15]
GilkT.MRI suites: safety outside the bore. patient safety quality healthcare. Available at:www.psqh.com. Sept‐Oct 2006. Accessed September 15 2016.
[28]
SOMATOM Force.Siemens healthcare GmbH—2016. Available at:www.healthcare.siemens.com/computed-tomography/dual-source-ct/somatom-force. Accessed September 15 2016.
[29]
U.S. nuclear regulatory commission backgrounder on biologic effects of radiation. Available at:http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/bio-effects-radiation.html. Accessed September 15 2015.