journal article Feb 08, 2016

Why the Sky Didn't Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws

Political Psychology Vol. 38 No. 2 pp. 331-350 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/pops.12332
Abstract
Since 2002, 26 U.S. states have passed laws that enhance restrictions on voters who intend to register and vote. Most have been sponsored by Republican legislators and passed by states with large Republican majorities. Proponents of such identification requirements argue that they are necessary to ensure the integrity of the electoral system by reducing voter fraud. Many Democrats have cried foul, arguing these laws are motivated by crass partisanship at best, and racial bias at worst, because they disproportionately disenfranchise minorities. Surprisingly, empirical evidence for significant demobilization, either in the aggregate or among Democrats specifically, has thus far failed to materialize. We suspect strong emotional reactions to the public debate about these laws may mobilize Democrats, counterbalancing the disenfranchising effect. We find support for this conjecture in a nationally representative survey and an experiment where news frames about voter identification (ID) laws are carefully manipulated.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
57
[1]
Alvarez R. M. Ansolabehere S. Berinsky A. Lenz G. StewartIII C. &Hall T.(2008). 2008 Survey of the performance of American elections. Final report Boston MA: Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project.
[2]
Alvarez R. M. Bailey D. &Katz J.(2008). The effect of Voter ID laws on turnout. Social Science Working Paper 1267R. 10.2139/ssrn.1084598
[4]
Ansolabehere S. "Vote fraud in the eye of the beholder: The role of public opinion in the challenge to voter identification requirements" Harvard Law Review (2008)
[9]
Biggers D. R. &Hanmer M. J.(2011) When voting gets harder: Understanding the adoption of voter identification laws in the American states. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Seattle WA.
[10]
Brader T. (2006)
[14]
Downs A. (1957)
[16]
Erikson R. S. "Modeling problems in the voter identification – Voter turnout debate" Election Law Journal (2009) 10.1089/elj.2008.0017
[19]
Hasen R. L. (2012)
[21]
Herron M. C. &Smith D. A.(2014). Race Shelby County and the Voter Information Verification Act in North Carolina. Unpublished manuscript Dartmouth College.
[27]
Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects

Kosuke Imai, Luke Keele, Teppei Yamamoto

Statistical Science 10.1214/10-sts321
[28]
Keyssar A. (2008)
[29]
Kinder D. R. (1996)
[30]
Lazarus R. S. (1991) 10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001
[34]
Marcus G. E. (2000)
[35]
McGerr M. E. (1988)
[37]
Milyo J.(2007). The effects of photographic identification on voter turnout in Indiana: A county‐level analysis. Columbia MO: Institute of Public Policy Report.
[39]
Nagler J. "The effect of registration laws and education on U.S. voter turnout" American Politics Research (1991)
[40]
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2016). Voter identification requirements: Voter ID laws. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id.aspx.
[43]
Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood

ERIC PLUTZER

American Political Science Review 10.1017/s0003055402004227
[45]
Rosenstone S. J. (1993)
[47]
StewartIII C.(2013). 2012 Survey of the performance of American elections. Final Report. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[48]
StewartIII C.(2015). 2014 Survey of the performance of American Elections. Final Report. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Showing 50 of 57 references

Metrics
96
Citations
57
References
Details
Published
Feb 08, 2016
Vol/Issue
38(2)
Pages
331-350
License
View
Cite This Article
Nicholas A. Valentino, Fabian G. Neuner (2016). Why the Sky Didn't Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws. Political Psychology, 38(2), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12332
Related

You May Also Like