journal article Open Access Jul 05, 2016

The Social Causes and Political Consequences of Group Empathy

Political Psychology Vol. 38 No. 3 pp. 427-448 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/pops.12352
Abstract
Recent scholarship has discovered significant racial/ethnic group variation in response to political threats such as immigration and terrorism. Surprisingly, minority groups often simultaneously perceive themselves to be at greater risk from such threats and yet still prefer more open immigration policies and civil liberties protections. We suggest a group‐level empathy process may explain this puzzle: Due to their higher levels of empathy for other disadvantaged groups, many minority group members support protections for others even when their own interests are threatened. Little is known, however, about the unique properties of group empathy or its role in policy opinion formation. In this study, we examine the reliability and validity of our new measure of group empathy, the Group Empathy Index (GEI), demonstrating that it is distinct from other social and political predispositions such as ethnocentrism, social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, ideology, and partisanship. We then propose a theory about the development of group empathy in reaction to life experiences based on one's race/ethnicity, gender, age, and education. Finally, we examine the power of group empathy to predict policy attitudes and political behavior.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
62
[3]
Batson C. D. (1991)
[6]
Borjas G. J. (2001)
[7]
Brader T. Valentino N. A. Ryan T. J. &Jardina A. E.(2010). The racial divide on immigration opinion: Why African Americans are less threatened by immigrants. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association Washington DC.
[10]
Cao X. (2010)
[11]
Chavez L. (2008)
[15]
Cooper B. (2011)
[17]
Davis M. H. "A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy" JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology (1980)
[21]
Dawson M. C. (1994)
[23]
Dimock M. Doherty C. &Suls R.(2013 March 28). Most say illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay but citizenship is more divisive.Pew Research Center for the People and Press. Retrieved fromhttp://www.people-press.org/2013/03/28/most-say-illegal-immigrants-should-be-allowed-to-stay-but-citizenship-is-more-divisive/
[26]
Eagly A. H. (1987)
[27]
Eisenberg N. (1998)
[29]
Erikson E. H. (1989)
[31]
Feldman S.(2014). The political consequences of empathy: Ideology caring and social welfare attitudes. Presented at the 2014 annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology Rome Italy.
[43]
Litvack‐Miller W. "The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior" Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs (1997)

Showing 50 of 62 references

Cited By
67
Current Opinion in Behavioral Scien...
Proceedings of the National Academy...
Metrics
67
Citations
62
References
Details
Published
Jul 05, 2016
Vol/Issue
38(3)
Pages
427-448
License
View
Funding
University of Michigan and the University of Texas at El Paso
Cite This Article
Cigdem V. Sirin, Nicholas A. Valentino, José D. Villalobos (2016). The Social Causes and Political Consequences of Group Empathy. Political Psychology, 38(3), 427-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12352
Related

You May Also Like