journal article Open Access Sep 25, 2024

A cross‐cultural test of competing hypotheses about system justification using data from 42 nations

Political Psychology Vol. 46 No. 4 pp. 822-846 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/pops.13039
Abstract
AbstractSystem justification theory (SJT) is a thriving field of research, wherein the primary questions revolve around why individuals and groups are motivated to see the systems they depend on as just, fair, and legitimate. This article seeks to answer how accurate the postulates of SJT are when compared to competing self‐interest claims of social identity and social dominance theory. We addressed the ongoing debates among proponents of each theory by identifying who, when, and why individuals decide to system‐justify. We used data comprised of 24,009 participants nested within 42 countries. Multilevel models largely supported the competing claims of social dominance and social identity theories over SJT. The most robust findings were: (1) greater objective socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with greater system justification; (2) the consistent positive relationship between subjective SES and system justification was partially mediated by life satisfaction; and (3) both ends of the political spectrum were willing to system‐justify more when the political party they favored was in power. The results presented are used to discuss both the current state and the future directions for system justification research.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
98
[2]
Adorno T. W. (1950)
[4]
Asai M. (2019)
[7]
Bates D. Mächler M. Bolker B. &Walker S.(2014).Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4.arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
[21]
Farhat S.(2020).Rising inequality affecting more than two‐thirds of the globe but it's not inevitable: New UN report.UN News.
[23]
Freedom House. (2018).Freedom in countries and territories.https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom‐world/scores.
[27]
Hasell J. (2022)
[34]
Jost J. T. (2021)
[39]
Jost J. T. (2015)
[42]
Jost J. T. (2013)

Showing 50 of 98 references

Metrics
7
Citations
98
References
Details
Published
Sep 25, 2024
Vol/Issue
46(4)
Pages
822-846
License
View
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Award: EXC 2126/1‐390838866
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Award: 15H05730
H2020 European Research Council Award: 635356
Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development Award: FA 2386‐15‐1‐0003
Cite This Article
Evan A. Valdes, James H. Liu, Matt Williams, et al. (2024). A cross‐cultural test of competing hypotheses about system justification using data from 42 nations. Political Psychology, 46(4), 822-846. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.13039
Related

You May Also Like