The promises and pitfalls of using panel data to understand individual belief change
We investigate whether studies on political belief change can identify change trajectories at the individual level. Using simulations and case studies, we propose a grid‐search framework that allows researchers to evaluate the extent to which their target estimates generalize to their study population. We use simulated datasets to estimate plausible values for how many people changed, how much they changed, and who changed, based on observed response trajectories. Our results suggest that researchers should think carefully about the conditions under which they may make claims about belief change at the individual level. To guide substantive theory‐building, we propose a concise diagnostic routine researchers can use to translate their claims into a set of plausible alternatives and evaluate potential generative processes. We provide an R package to help researchers implement this procedure in their own work.
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
Stephen Ansolabehere, Jonathan Rodden, James M. Snyder
Larry M. Bartels, Simon Jackman
Ethan Fosse, Christopher Winship
Charles M. Judd, Michael A. Milburn
Alaa Tharwat
- Published
- Jul 04, 2025
- Vol/Issue
- 47(2)
- License
- View
You May Also Like
John T. Jost, Mahzarin R. Banaji · 2004
1,882 citations
D.J. Flynn, Brendan Nyhan · 2017
721 citations
Arie W. Kruglanski, Michele J. Gelfand · 2014
547 citations
Robert T. Schatz, Ervin Staub · 1999
544 citations