journal article Open Access Dec 22, 2023

Examining the validity of the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) and its domains using network analysis

Psychogeriatrics Vol. 24 No. 2 pp. 259-271 · Wiley
View at Publisher Save 10.1111/psyg.13069
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used standardised screener for impairments across a range of cognitive domains. However, the degree to which its domains (orientation, registration, attention, recall, language, and visuospatial) capture cognitive functioning measured using standardised neuropsychological tests is unclear.MethodA longitudinal research design with four biannual assessments over a 6‐year period was used with an initial sample of 1037 older adults (aged above 70 years). Participants completed MMSE and neuropsychological tests at each assessment. Network analysis was utilised to investigate unique associations among the MMSE and its domains and neuropsychological test performance at each time point.ResultsThe total MMSE and two of its domains, language and recall, were associated with neuropsychological memory performance. The MMSE orientation, registration and visuospatial domains did not have any unique associations with neuropsychological performance. No stable internal interconnections between MMSE domains were found over time. The association of total MMSE as well as its recall domain with neuropsychological memory performance remained very similar over the 6‐year period.ConclusionsThe present study adds evidence to the validity of the MMSE and supports the clinical usage of the MMSE, whereby the total score is used for screening patients with or without cognitive impairments, with repeated administration to monitor cognitive changes over time, to inform intervention. However, the tool is not able to diagnose the cases for changes in specific cognitive domains and as such, should not replace a complete neuropsychological assessment.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
49
[1]
“Mini-mental state”

Marshal F. Folstein, Susan E. Folstein, Paul R. McHugh

Journal of Psychiatric Research 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
[3]
Norris DR "The mental status examination" Am Fam Physician (2016)
[4]
Brayne C "The mini‐mental state examination, will we be using it in 2001?" Int J Geriatr Psychiatry (1998)
[6]
Ciolek CH (2019)
[12]
Wechsler D (1981)
[15]
Ramirez D "Mini‐mental state exam domains predict falls in an elderly population: follow‐up from the Hispanic established populations for epidemiologic Studiesof the elderly (H‐EPESE) study" Ethn Dis (2010)
[16]
Strauss E (2006)
[17]
McGrew KS "CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research" Dermatol Int (2009)
[19]
Network Analysis: An Integrative Approach to the Structure of Psychopathology

Denny Borsboom, Angélique O.J. Cramer

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
[21]
Barcaccia B "Mindfulness, self‐compassion and attachment: a network analysis of psychopathology symptoms in adolescents" Mind (2020)
[24]
Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science

Denny Borsboom, Marie K. Deserno, Mijke Rhemtulla et al.

Nature Reviews Methods Primers 10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w
[29]
Wechsler D (2003)
[31]
Kaplan E (2001)
[32]
Spreen O (1977)
[34]
Reitan RM (1993)
[35]
WechslerD.Wechsler adult intelligence scale: WAIS‐R manual: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich [for] The Psychological Corporation 1981.
[36]
Wechsler D (1997)
[37]
Benton AL (1996)
[39]
Understanding and interpreting confidence and credible intervals around effect estimates

Luiz Hespanhol, Caio Sain Vallio, Lucíola Menezes Costa et al.

Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.12.006
[40]
Graph drawing by force‐directed placement

Thomas M. J. Fruchterman, Edward M. Reingold

Software: Practice and Experience 10.1002/spe.4380211102
[41]
qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data

Sacha Epskamp, Angélique O. J. Cramer, Lourens J. Waldorp et al.

Journal of Statistical Software 10.18637/jss.v048.i04
[42]
Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network.

Donald J. Robinaugh, Alexander J. Millner, Richard J. McNally

Journal of Abnormal Psychology 10.1037/abn0000181
[48]
Domains of cognition and their assessment

Philip D. Harvey

Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 10.31887/dcns.2019.21.3/pharvey
Metrics
39
Citations
49
References
Details
Published
Dec 22, 2023
Vol/Issue
24(2)
Pages
259-271
License
View
Cite This Article
Quoc Cuong Truong, Matti Cervin, Carol C. Choo, et al. (2023). Examining the validity of the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) and its domains using network analysis. Psychogeriatrics, 24(2), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.13069