journal article Open Access Dec 02, 2021

The skin conductance response indicating pain relief is independent of self or social influence on pain

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/psyp.13978
Abstract
Abstract

Pain relief is defined as the ease of pain and is thus highly relevant for clinical applications and everyday life. Given that pain relief is based on the cessation of an aversive pain experience, it is reasonable to assume that pain relief learning would also be shaped by factors that alter subjective and physiological pain responses, such as social presence or a feeling of control. To date, it remains unclear whether and how factors that shape autonomic pain responses might affect pain relief learning. Here, we investigated how pain relief learning is shaped by two important factors known to modulate pain responses, i.e. social influence and controllability of pain. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) were recorded while participants learned to associate a formerly neutral stimulus with pain relief under three different pain conditions. In the social‐influence condition (
N
 = 34), the pain stimulation could be influenced by another person’s decisions. In the self‐influence condition (
N
 = 31), the participants themselves could influence the pain stimulation. Finally, in the no‐influence condition (
N
 = 32), pain stimulation was simply delivered without any influence. According to our results, the SCRs elicited by the stimulus that was associated with pain relief were significantly smaller compared to the SCRs elicited by a neutral control stimulus, indicating pain relief learning. However, there was no significant difference in the pain relief learning effect across the groups. These results suggest that physiological pain relief learning in humans is not significantly influenced by social influence and pain controllability.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
76
[3]
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002 amended effective June 1 2010 and January 1 2017).http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.html
[7]
A rift between implicit and explicit conditioned valence in human pain relief learning

Marta Andreatta, Andreas Mühlberger, Ayse Yarali et al.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series... 10.1098/rspb.2010.0103
[11]
Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies

Terry D. Blumenthal, Bruce N. Cuthbert, Diane L. Filion et al.

Psychophysiology 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00271.x
[14]
Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements
Psychophysiology 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01384.x
[15]
Social Support and Experimental Pain

Jennifer L. Brown, David Sheffield, Mark R. Leary et al.

Psychosomatic Medicine 10.1097/01.psy.0000030388.62434.46
[16]
Investigating the influence of social support on experimental pain and related physiological arousal: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xianwei Che, Robin Cash, Sungwook Chung et al.

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.005
[17]
Critchley H. "Electrodermal activity (EDA)" Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (2013)
[23]
Observer influences on pain: an experimental series examining same-sex and opposite-sex friends, strangers, and romantic partners

Rhiannon Edwards, Christopher Eccleston, Edmund Keogh

Pain 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000840
[24]
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses

Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner et al.

Behavior Research Methods 10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
[29]
Hautzinger M. (1993)
[31]
How learning shapes the empathic brain

Grit Hein, Jan B. Engelmann, Marius C. Vollberg et al.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 10.1073/pnas.1514539112
[33]
MEASUREMENT OF PAIN

E.C Huskisson

The Lancet 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8
[42]
Krohne H. W. "Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “positive and negative affect schedule” (PANAS)" Diagnostica (1996)
[44]
Laux L. (1981)
[50]
Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use

M. Malik, J. T. Bigger, A. J. Camm et al.

European Heart Journal 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868

Showing 50 of 76 references

Related

You May Also Like

Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats

Gary G. Berntson, J. THOMAS BIGGER · 1997

2,977 citations

The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation

Margaret M. Bradley, Laura Miccoli · 2008

1,539 citations

Guidelines for Human Electromyographic Research

Alan J. Fridlund, John T. Cacioppo · 1986

1,303 citations