Abstract
Abstract
The reproduction number R has been a central metric of the COVID-19 pandemic response, published weekly by the UK government and regularly reported in the media. Here, we provide a formal definition and discuss the advantages and most common misconceptions around this quantity. We consider the intuition behind different formulations of R, the complexities in its estimation (including the unavoidable lags involved), and its value compared to other indicators (e.g. the growth rate) that can be directly observed from aggregate surveillance data and react more promptly to changes in epidemic trend. As models become more sophisticated, with age and/or spatial structure, formulating R becomes increasingly complicated and inevitably model-dependent. We present some models currently used in the UK pandemic response as examples. Ultimately, limitations in the available data streams, data quality and time constraints force pragmatic choices to be made on a quantity that is an average across time, space, social structure and settings. Effectively communicating these challenges is important but often difficult in an emergency.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
32
[1]
Anderson "Reproduction number (R) and growth rate (r) of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK: methods of estimation, data sources, causes of heterogeneity, and use as a guide in policy formulation" The Royal Society (2020)
[2]
Bacaër "The epidemic threshold of vector-borne diseases with seasonality" Journal of Mathematical Biology (2006) 10.1007/s00285-006-0015-0
[3]
Ball "Reproduction numbers for epidemic models with households and other social structures II: comparisons and implications for vaccination" Mathematical Biosciences (2016) 10.1016/j.mbs.2016.01.006
[4]
Birrell (2020)
[5]
Birrell "Real-time nowcasting and forecasting of COVID-19 dynamics in England: the first wave" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (2021) 10.1098/rstb.2020.0279
[6]
Britton "Estimation in emerging epidemics: biases and remedies" Journal of the Royal Society Interface (2019) 10.1098/rsif.2018.0670
[7]
Brooks-Pollock "Mapping social distancing measures to the reproduction number for COVID-19" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (2021) 10.1098/rstb.2020.0276
[8]
[9]
Challen "Estimates of regional infectivity of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom following imposition of social distancing measures" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (2021) 10.1098/rstb.2020.0280
[10]
A New Framework and Software to Estimate Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers During Epidemics

Anne Cori, Neil M. Ferguson, Christophe Fraser et al.

American Journal of Epidemiology 2013 10.1093/aje/kwt133
[11]
De Angelis (2019)
[12]
Diekmann (2012)
[13]
Gershuny (2017)
[14]
Practical considerations for measuring the effective reproductive number, Rt

Katelyn M. Gostic, Lauren McGough, Edward B. Baskerville et al.

PLOS Computational Biology 2020 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008409
[15]
Keeling (2011) 10.2307/j.ctvcm4gk0
[16]
Lipsitch "Transmission dynamics and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome" Science (2003) 10.1126/science.1086616
[17]
Maishman (2021)
[18]
Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases

Joël Mossong, Niel Hens, Mark Jit et al.

PLoS Medicine 2008 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074
[19]
Overton (2021)
[20]
Are Epidemic Growth Rates More Informative than Reproduction Numbers?

Kris V. Parag, Robin N. Thompson, Christl A. Donnelly

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A:... 2022 10.1111/rssa.12867
[21]
Pellis "Challenges in control of COVID-19: short doubling time and long delay to effect of interventions" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (2021) 10.1098/rstb.2020.0264
[22]
REACT 1 (2020)
[23]
REACT 2 (2020)
[24]
Survey O (2021)
[25]
The Guardian (2020)
[26]
Thompson "Improved inference of time-varying reproduction numbers during infectious disease outbreaks" Epidemics (2019) 10.1016/j.epidem.2019.100356
[27]
UK Government (2021)
[28]
UK Government Guidance (2020)
[29]
Leeuwen "Augmenting contact matrices with time-use data for fine-grained intervention modelling of disease dynamics: a modelling analysis" Statistical Methods in Medical Research (2020)
[30]
Vekaria "Hospital length of stay for COVID-19 patients: Data-driven methods for forward planning" BMC Infectious Diseases (2021) 10.1186/s12879-021-06371-6
[31]
Wallinga "Different epidemic curves for severe acute respiratory syndrome reveal similar impacts of control measures" American Journal of Epidemiology (2004) 10.1093/aje/kwh255
[32]
Wearing "Appropriate models for the management of infectious diseases" PLoS Medicine (2005)
Cited By
26
Renewal equations for mosquito‐borne diseases

Cathal Mills, Tarek Alrefae · 2025

Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Journal of the Royal Statistical So...
Metrics
26
Citations
32
References
Details
Published
Nov 01, 2022
Vol/Issue
185(Supplement_1)
Pages
S112-S130
License
View
Funding
Wellcome Trust Award: 202562/Z/16/Z
Medical Research Council Award: MC UU 00002/11
Royal Society Award: INF∖R2∖180067
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Award: EP/N510129/1
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Economic and Social Research Council
Alan Turing Institute
National Institute for Health Research
National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit Award: NIHR200877
Cite This Article
Lorenzo Pellis, Paul J. Birrell, Joshua Blake, et al. (2022). Estimation of Reproduction Numbers in Real Time: Conceptual and Statistical Challenges. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 185(Supplement_1), S112-S130. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12955
Related

You May Also Like

A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis

Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon G. Thompson · 2008

2,042 citations

ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis

Cedric Ginestet · 2011

1,294 citations

Fisher's Exact Test

Graham J. G. Upton · 1992

349 citations

Prediction in Multilevel Generalized Linear Models

Anders Skrondal, Sophia Rabe-Hesketh · 2009

174 citations