Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this article was to introduce the reader to the nature of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) and pitfalls in their use. PROMs collect subjective information directly from the patient regarding specific or general conditions and add to clinical and functional outcomes, and turn unmeasurable subjective qualities into quantitative measures. PROMs are questionnaires consisting of items: questions or statements with predefined response options. The items in an adequate PROM have been developed by involvement of patients with the condition in focus, and the PROM has been validated for these patients using suitable statistical methods. An adequate well‐targeted PROM is more responsive than an inadequate PROM. Unfortunately, many studies use inadequate PROMs as outcomes. The methods used to generate PROMs should be described as thoroughly as those used to develop any other types of measurement instruments, and the choice of PROM should always be explained and thereby justified. If the PROM used is not adequate, the consequences for the interpretation of the results should be discussed. In many cases, an adequate PROM does not exist. If the best available PROM is chosen, there are methods to validate the adequacy of the chosen PROM, which make an interpretation of the study results possible.
Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References
19
[3]
Christensen KB "Psychometric validation of PROM instruments" Scand J Med Sci Sports
[5]
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

John E. Ware, Cathy Donald Sherbourne

Medical Care 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
[8]
Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form

James J. Irrgang, Allen F. Anderson, Arthur L. Boland et al.

The American Journal of Sports Medicine 10.1177/03635465010290051301
[10]
Comins J "The association between patient‐reported outcome and physical outcome measures in Danish patients one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" DOS Bulletin (2014)
[14]
The VISA-A questionnaire: a valid and reliable index of the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy

J M Robinson, J L Cook, C Purdam et al.

British Journal of Sports Medicine 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.335
Metrics
64
Citations
19
References
Details
Published
Dec 25, 2020
Vol/Issue
31(5)
Pages
967-971
License
View
Cite This Article
Michael R. Krogsgaard, John Brodersen, Karl Bang Christensen, et al. (2020). What is a PROM and why do we need it?. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 31(5), 967-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13892