Two good interview questions: Mobilizing the ‘good farmer’ and the ‘good day’ concepts to enable more‐than‐representational research

Lee‐Ann Sutherland

doi:10.1111/soru.12344

journal article Open Access Jul 04, 2021

Two good interview questions: Mobilizing the ‘good farmer’ and the ‘good day’ concepts to enable more‐than‐representational research

Lee‐Ann Sutherland

Sociologia Ruralis Vol. 61 No. 4 pp. 681-703 · Wiley

View at Publisher Save 10.1111/soru.12344

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, I assess the utility of two targeted qualitative interview questions: descriptions of a ‘good farmer’ and a ‘good day’, for eliciting rich textual data. Studies where farmers have been asked to describe or define a good farmer have been utilized across a growing range of international contexts in order to identify farmers’ cultural scripts, symbolic capital and social norms. The constitution of a ‘good day’ is new to rural studies but has been employed academically to assess perceptions of well‐being and job satisfaction. I employ document analysis to analyse the multiple uses of the ‘good farmer’ question in the rural studies literature and introduce a contrasting empirical application the ‘good day’ question in a rural case study in the United Kingdom. Findings demonstrate that both interview questions can generate rich textual descriptions of embodied performances. ‘Good farmer’ definitions may also include a moral judgement, whereas the ‘good day’ question specifically yields descriptions of affect. Farmers are reluctant to identify ‘bad farmers’, but asking about a ‘bad day’ can open up discussion of the vulnerabilities of farming life. Both questions are thus suited to more‐than‐representational research, gaining utility from their congruence between common parlance and academic conceptualization.

Topics

No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →

References

92

[1]

10.1080/09518390902736512

[2]

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.04.012

[3]

10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1723

[4]

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.01.001

[5]

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.006

[6]

Bourdieu P. (1984)

[7]

Bourdieu P. (1986)

[8]

10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199861392.001.0001

[9]

10.1111/soru.12307

[10]

10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x

[11]

10.1080/01426397.2011.559311

[12]

Burton R.J.F. (2021)

[13]

10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00452.x

[14]

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.11.001

[15]

10.1016/s0743-0167(98)00015-1

[16]

10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00458.x

[17]

10.1007/s11625-014-0280-6

[18]

10.5172/conu.2013.45.1.126

[19]

10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.032

[20]

Clough P.T. (2007)

[21]

Creswell J.W. (2018)

[22]

10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.011

[23]

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.021

[24]

10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.026

[25]

Dewsbury J.D. (2009)

[26]

10.1007/s11205-013-0279-x

[27]

Dirksmeier P. "Time, non‐representational theory and the “performative turn”—Towards a new methodology in qualitative social research" Forum: Qualitative Social Research (2008)

[28]

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.01.003

[29]

10.1007/s10460-014-9520-8

[30]

10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.021

[31]

10.1080/02678370412331324996

[32]

10.3168/jds.2018-15015

[33]

10.1177/0020764005060844

[34]

10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.016

[35]

10.1016/s0743-0167(98)00010-2

[36]

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.012

[37]

10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.003

[38]

10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00556.x

[39]

10.1079/9781780646251.0185

[40]

10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00373.x

[41]

10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.001

[42]

10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.004

[43]

10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.05.015

[44]

10.1007/s00127-019-01738-2

[45]

10.1111/ruso.12091

[46]

King N. (2019)

[47]

Dissatisfied with Life but Having a Good Day: Time‐use and Well‐being of the Unemployed

Andreas Knabe, Steffen Rätzel, Ronnie Schöb et al.

The Economic Journal 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02347.x

[48]

10.1191/0309132505ph531pr

[49]

10.1111/gec3.12446

[50]

10.1111/j.1939-3938.2011.01118.x

Showing 50 of 92 references

Metrics

13

Citations

92

References

Details

Published: Jul 04, 2021
Vol/Issue: 61(4)
Pages: 681-703
License: View

Authors

L

Lee‐Ann Sutherland

The James Hutton Institute Aberdeen UK

Cite This Article

Lee‐Ann Sutherland (2021). Two good interview questions: Mobilizing the ‘good farmer’ and the ‘good day’ concepts to enable more‐than‐representational research. Sociologia Ruralis, 61(4), 681-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12344

Two good interview questions: Mobilizing the ‘good farmer’ and the ‘good day’ concepts to enable more‐than‐representational research

You May Also Like