Studying Stereotype Accuracy from an Integrative Social‐Personality Perspective
This article proposes an integrative framework for understanding the accuracy and inaccuracy of stereotypes. Specifically, we highlight research issues and traditions from social and personality psychology that do not often intersect, but which can be mutually informative. Within this framework, the social psychologist's interest in the accuracy of group stereotypes is conceptually much like a personality psychologist's interest in the accuracy with which perceivers can identify types of individuals, for example extraverts. Both fields make use, implicitly or explicitly, of personal attributes and behaviors (cues) in assessing accuracy of beliefs about group or individual traits. By using Brunswik's lens model perspective in combination with concepts from signal detection theory, judgments of stereotypes can be discovered to be accurate or inaccurate depending on how perceivers judge or use the cues. In drawing on research traditions and theoretical frameworks from both social and personality psychology, researchers can go beyond an all‐or‐nothing stance regarding stereotype accuracy to achieve a more nuanced understanding of when, how, and to what extent stereotypes are accurate.
No keywords indexed for this article. Browse by subject →
John A. Bargh, Tanya L. Chartrand
Sapna Cheryan, Sianna A. Ziegler, Amanda K. Montoya et al.
Paul T. Costa, Antonio Terracciano, Robert R. McCrae
Bella M. DePaulo, James J. Lindsay, Brian E. Malone et al.
Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Nalini Ambady
Matthias R. Mehl, Simine Vazire, Nairán Ramírez-Esparza et al.
Showing 50 of 60 references
- Published
- Oct 17, 2017
- Vol/Issue
- 11(11)
- License
- View
You May Also Like
Tony Jung, K. A. S. Wickrama · 2007
2,561 citations
Derek D. Rucker, Kristopher J. Preacher · 2011
1,817 citations
Adrian Furnham, Steven C. Richards · 2013
1,114 citations
Matthew J. Hornsey · 2008
1,020 citations